OOoCon Reviewing

OOo Marketing Project Please view the guidelines before contributing.
Categories: Art Conference (OOoCon) Draft ideas and materials Marketing Pages: Major OOo Deployments New releases Info To Do List Quick and Easy Activities Marketing Volunteers List Market Share Analysis Marketing to Developers Press Coverage The Case for Switching Why.OpenOffice.org Marketing Activities Record MarketingCampaign_Q3-2007 OOo Conferences Checklist for Decision Makers User Perception Research Strategic Marketing Plan Pages: Strategic Marketing Plan SMP To Do Projects on this Wiki: (edit list) Art Project * Application Framework Documentation Education Project * Marketing Project * Native Language Confederation * Product Releases Security Team Universal Network Objects User Experience Project Website Project Writer Project
Marketing.OpenOffice View or edit this template.

Category:OOoCon

Reviewing

This page contains general guidance for people who are reviewing papers for OOoCon.

Conflict of Interest

You have a conflict of interest with an author if

• you work closely together within the same Project
• you both work in the same reporting line in the same company
• you are partners in business, government, academia, or other organisation
• you have close personal or family ties
• you have been engaged in flame wars or other professional rivalries or feuds

In any of these cases, you should return the Abstract and explain why you cannot review it

Providing Feedback

You have a duty to read Abstracts with care and sympathy. Your feedback should be suitable for forwarding on to the Proposer, although by exception you may wish you comments only to go to the OOoCon Team.

The best feedback is one which encourages the speaker to produce an even better paper for OOoCon.