Difference between revisions of "OOoCon Reviewing"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
(New page: {{Marketing}} Category:OOoCon Category:Draft_marketing_ideas_and_materials Category:OOoCon = Reviewing = This page contains general guidance for people who are reviewing pape...) |
m |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* you have close personal or family ties | * you have close personal or family ties | ||
* you have been engaged in flame wars or other professional rivalries or feuds | * you have been engaged in flame wars or other professional rivalries or feuds | ||
| − | In any of these cases, you should return the Abstract and explain why you cannot | + | In any of these cases, you should return the Abstract and explain why you cannot review it |
== Providing Feedback == | == Providing Feedback == | ||
You have a duty to read Abstracts with care and sympathy. Your feedback should be suitable for forwarding on to the Proposer, although by exception you may wish you comments only to go to the OOoCon Team. | You have a duty to read Abstracts with care and sympathy. Your feedback should be suitable for forwarding on to the Proposer, although by exception you may wish you comments only to go to the OOoCon Team. | ||
The best feedback is one which encourages the speaker to produce an even better paper for OOoCon. | The best feedback is one which encourages the speaker to produce an even better paper for OOoCon. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:58, 4 July 2009
| OOo Marketing Project
Please view the guidelines
|
|---|
|
Categories: Pages:
Strategic Marketing Plan Pages: Projects on this Wiki: (edit list)
|
| Marketing.OpenOffice |
Reviewing
This page contains general guidance for people who are reviewing papers for OOoCon.
Conflict of Interest
You have a conflict of interest with an author if
- you work closely together within the same Project
- you both work in the same reporting line in the same company
- you are partners in business, government, academia, or other organisation
- you have close personal or family ties
- you have been engaged in flame wars or other professional rivalries or feuds
In any of these cases, you should return the Abstract and explain why you cannot review it
Providing Feedback
You have a duty to read Abstracts with care and sympathy. Your feedback should be suitable for forwarding on to the Proposer, although by exception you may wish you comments only to go to the OOoCon Team.
The best feedback is one which encourages the speaker to produce an even better paper for OOoCon.
