Difference between revisions of "Talk:Uno/To-Dos"
(Moved from page.) |
m (Talk:Uno/Todo moved to Talk:Uno/To-Dos: Fixed writing.) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 08:53, 14 December 2006
Comments
How about type providers for Java Archive files, .NET assemblies?
That way, we can hold types the way that best fits, i.e. the target language of the component (→ no need to deploy both rdb and jar anymore). And this embraces the "*makers read from type manager/type providers" feature (→ I can generate types for lang A out of types from lang B without an intermediate format).
- This is basically what I meant with "alien type support" ~~kr
The Clear Separation between C and C++ and Core Components ideas sound nice. During the mono-port of cliuno (mostly port from Managed C++ to C#) (not quite complete yet, sorry) I had to make C wrappers for cppuhelper bootstrap stuff (so that I could P/Invoke them). IIRC there was also a part where I wished I had a C API for the shlib loader, can't remember the details, though.
- Martin, would you be interested in helping with this? Kr 09:07, 4 July 2006 (CEST)
