Difference between revisions of "Performance"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 34: Line 34:
 
== Helpful Tooling and Resources ==
 
== Helpful Tooling and Resources ==
  
=== Standard Test Environment ===
+
=== Test Environment ===
...
+
Popular reference configuration(use similar env on Berlin and Beijing)
 +
CPU:    Core2 Duo 1.5~2G
 +
Memory: 512M
 +
OS:    WindowsXP HOME
  
 
=== Test & Tuning Tools ===
 
=== Test & Tuning Tools ===
Line 48: Line 51:
  
 
=== Benchmarks & Description ===
 
=== Benchmarks & Description ===
 +
If you have some benchmarks, share them here!
 +
 +
== Performance Test Results Distribution ==
 +
 +
=== Test results for Different Versions ===
 +
...
 +
 +
=== Contrastive Data & Analysis ===
 
...
 
...
  
== Approaches being worked on ==  
+
== Work List and Progress ==  
 
* Configmgr re-factor, reduces locking overhead & memory usage cf. CWS configrefactor01
 
* Configmgr re-factor, reduces locking overhead & memory usage cf. CWS configrefactor01
 
* [[XML Load]]
 
* [[XML Load]]

Revision as of 03:38, 1 February 2008

As George Ou has famously said, "It doesn't matter how fast the CPU is, OpenOffice is just bloated."

Project Summary

Project will achieve the goal: maintain good performance and evaluate OOo.

OOo Issues

Issues from End-User

...

Known areas for improvement

Component issues

system issues

  • Linux / Linking - relocation processing is very slow ( ogg video, odp slides ) several possible ways to fix that
    • re-ordering symbol & elf hash tables to improve cache locality, lots of good & simple ideas here.
    • -Bdirect implementation [1] - gaining little traction.
    • exporting Vague linkage more cleverly & using RTLD_LOCAL where possible
    • basic linker optimizations:
      • don't export *UND* in .hash table
      • sort syms & dynsym entries more intelligently
      • .hashvals optimisation
  • Linux / I/O scheduling & pre-loading is poor

General I/O & memory issues

  • Image strip layout - our images strips are huge & unwieldy, layed out horizontally and are 'cached' in scattered files - this is fixed in CWS ka009, which never seems to get integrated.
  • Configuration information scattered across many files
  • UI configuration - tons of scattered files
  • .rdb files - loads of empty space, mmap + random access pattern

Helpful Tooling and Resources

Test Environment

Popular reference configuration(use similar env on Berlin and Beijing)

CPU:    Core2 Duo 1.5~2G
Memory: 512M
OS:     WindowsXP HOME

Test & Tuning Tools

Benchmarks & Description

If you have some benchmarks, share them here!

Performance Test Results Distribution

Test results for Different Versions

...

Contrastive Data & Analysis

...

Work List and Progress

  • Configmgr re-factor, reduces locking overhead & memory usage cf. CWS configrefactor01
  • XML Load
  • Config refactor - reduce seeks/files, better caching
  • Disk Access
  • -Bdirect linking
  • FIXME - Malte - we should really have your list embedded here ...

Integrated improvements

Other Pages

This Wiki page should become the ultimate authority on performance issues. Meanwhile, here are links to performance informationat other places

Personal tools