Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tinderbox Setup"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
(→What about support for shadow-trees?) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would it be possible to modify the tinderbox to just accept the build-status & logs that are generated by "build --all --html" (has per-module logs, etc. the script would only have to zip all the logs from the output-dirs) | Would it be possible to modify the tinderbox to just accept the build-status & logs that are generated by "build --all --html" (has per-module logs, etc. the script would only have to zip all the logs from the output-dirs) | ||
− | And a (prominent) link to the actual tinerbox would be nice too :-) | + | And a (prominent) link to the actual tinerbox would be nice too :-) [[User:Cloph|Cloph]] |
== What about support for shadow-trees? == | == What about support for shadow-trees? == |
Revision as of 22:46, 4 January 2006
Would it be possible to modify the tinderbox to just accept the build-status & logs that are generated by "build --all --html" (has per-module logs, etc. the script would only have to zip all the logs from the output-dirs)
And a (prominent) link to the actual tinerbox would be nice too :-) Cloph
What about support for shadow-trees?
Would it be possible to enhance the scripts so they work with a shadow-tree of an already present checkout?
Have the master (e.g. SRC680_m148) as normal checkout, then make shadowtree, build the master. After that, clean-up, make another shadowtree, update that tree to a given cws, build the cws, after that clean up... Cloph