ReleaseStatus Minutes 2008-09-08 IRC log
(15:01:34) _Nesshof_: issue 93539
(15:01:36) ja_: hi
(15:01:38) VolkerMe: List of bugs is at http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ReleaseStatus_Minutes#Agenda_for_next_meeting
(15:01:40) IZBot: l10n DEFECT NEW P2 [IT] Dozens of untranslated strings in Calc Online Help http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93539
(15:02:05) of_sun: Groetjes
(15:04:12) stefan__b: Hi!
(15:04:13) _Nesshof_: we are waiting for update from the Italian Community
(15:04:40) _Nesshof_: next one is issue 93559
(15:04:46) VolkerMe: Andrea just asked if the .po-files from 2.4.1 can be provided
(15:04:47) IZBot: Database access DEFECT NEW P2 Report Builder 1.0.5 cannot be installed http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93559
(15:04:56) _Nesshof_: ause is working on this
(15:05:07) _Nesshof_: VolkerMe: coni will comment in the issue
(15:05:31) _Nesshof_: i just commented issue 92147
(15:05:37) IZBot: Installation DEFECT REOPENED P2 no dict DE in Installation Packages http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92147
(15:06:15) bettina-h [n=Bettina_@nat/sun/x-7fe78598f783bf79] hat den Raum betreten.
(15:06:37) _Nesshof_: next on my list is issue 93512
(15:06:43) IZBot: framework DEFECT RESOLVED FIXED P3 Mac: Deadlock while installing extensions http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93512
(15:06:59) _Nesshof_: issue 93494
(15:07:05) IZBot: framework DEFECT RESOLVED FIXED P3 disable product sharing on win32 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93494
(15:07:07) _Nesshof_: issue 93574
(15:07:12) IZBot: Installation DEFECT VERIFIED FIXED P2 obsolete/duplicate desktop-integration RPMs http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93574
(15:07:18) _Nesshof_: issue 93607
(15:07:24) IZBot: framework DEFECT NEW P1 Hybrid PDF-import is broken http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93607
(15:07:30) MechtiIde: ans Issue 93564
(15:07:41) IZBot: gsl DEFECT RESOLVED FIXED P2 desktop-integration rpm broken in 3.0rc1 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93564
(15:08:44) _Nesshof_: it looks like we will need to do an rc2
(15:09:15) _rene_: we need to do anyway for the source tarballs ;)
(15:09:24) _rene_: (unless we wanted to exchange them ;) )
(15:09:53) _Nesshof_: _rene_: is there already an issue for the source tarballs ?
(15:10:04) _rene_: no
(15:10:25) ***_rene_ doesn't have reliable net at home atm so I didn't file one yet (currently @work)
(15:10:56) _Nesshof_: _rene_: I already took a looktinto the script, should be an easy task
(15:11:13) _Nesshof_: any other issues to raise ?
(15:11:26) _Nesshof_: or comments ?
(15:11:43) _rene_: no issue, but ETA
(15:11:47) _rene_: rc2? :)
(15:11:51) VolkerMe: _Nesshof_: Please add the mentioned issues to 88888
(15:12:13) _rene_: (just for planning purposes...)
(15:12:39) _Nesshof_: _rene_: depends on the further feedback for the rc,
(15:12:50) _Nesshof_: but I plan another build this week
(15:13:03) MechtiIde: _Nesshof_, +1
(15:13:12) _Nesshof_: rtimm: RE duties ?
(15:13:33) rtimm: _Nesshof_: Kurt (kz) will do OOO300
(15:13:41) ***ja_ is doing all uploads
(15:14:08) rtimm: No build on DEV300 planned yet. IIRC we want to migrate to SVN before next milestone.
(15:14:24) blauwal: yup
(15:15:13) _Nesshof_: blauwal: so migration already started ?
(15:15:37) rtimm: m31 'ready' mail is to be expected in 2-3 hours from now on.
(15:15:49) blauwal: m31 needs to be released and tagged. Then we can start with the migration.
(15:16:35) _Nesshof_: will you send out a notice to dev@ when the migration actually starts ?
(15:17:23) _Nesshof_: ok, anything else for today ?
(15:17:31) _rene_: and a mail with usage patterns of the new cws* would be good (if they differ to the CVS ones)
(15:18:18) VolkerMe: _Nesshof_: Can we keep the planned timeline for 3.0.1 nad 3.1?
(15:18:44) blauwal: _Nesshof_: yes
(15:19:03) blauwal: _rene_: There will be a Wiki page and a mail linking to it
(15:19:21) _rene_: ok
(15:19:46) _Nesshof_: VolkerMe: yes
(15:20:09) _Nesshof_: VolkerMe: or why do you think we can't
(15:21:52) VolkerMe: _Nesshof_: I did not view the full dateline but we had some RCs for Beta and the final will have too. Just asking for it
(15:21:53) _rene_: depending on how long 2.0 slips code freeze on Oct 28 might not be relatistic depending on what issues we want to fix and time for feedback on 3.0.0
(15:22:04) _rene_: s/2.0/3.0/
(15:22:22) _rene_: but that's hypothetical right now...
(15:22:26) VolkerMe: _rene_: Thx
(15:23:21) _Nesshof_: ok,by
(15:23:41) ja_: bye bye
(15:23:42) MechtiIde: bye
(15:23:43) _rene_: VolkerMe: I think you have a good point but we should think about it later
(15:24:05) _rene_: VolkerMe: when we know when 3.0.0 is there/will be there RSN
(15:24:15) of_sun: bye
(15:24:19) ***VolkerMe will erase the agenda, as nobody reads it
(15:24:25) _rene_: VolkerMe: then we have more data on time :-)
(15:25:03) _rene_: VolkerMe: right now, I think we can't properly judge that - we don't yet know how many rcs we need :-)
(15:25:59) bettina-h hat den Raum verlassen (quit: "ChatZilla 0.9.82.1 [Firefox 3.0.1/2008070208]").
(15:26:01) VolkerMe: _rene_: But we can erase dates which can not be kept from the view of today
