View source for Printerpullpages/Design Proposals

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki

← Printerpullpages/Design Proposals

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

• The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
• You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page.

This page is part of the CWS printerpullpages. Based on requirements, it collects design proposals and rates them - maybe some of the proposals get integrated into OpenOffice.org. === System Independent Print Dialog === ==== The Dialog Itself ==== Ideas: {| class="prettytable" border="0" | [[Image:Cwsprinterpullpages 2009-06-14 Ideas Dialog Resizing.JPG|300px]] | '''Automatic Dialog Resizing''' Currently, the size of the dialog is limited by the use of netbooks which only feature a very low vertical screen resolution. It would be desirable to have some kind of resizing of the dialog, so that we could provide a full dialog at the current [http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_30.html OpenOffice.org 3.0 system requirements] resolution of 1024x768 and a smaller version providing the same functionality for low resolution displays. Answer by Philipp: Theoretically, this is possible, but it would create effort which I would like to avoid. (E-Mail to Christoph, 2008-06-16, 11:17am) |} ==== Selecting the Printer and Providing Printer Information ==== Requirements (only new ones): If the user selects a printer for output, then the system should present meta information to the printer during the selection. (meta information: e.g. name, status, type, location, comment). Ideas: {| class="prettytable" border="0" | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrinterSelection_DropDown.JPG|300px]] | '''Enhanced Drop-Down''' The current dropdown could be extended by additional information to show the meta information of the printer - before the printer gets selected. This avoids the usual use case: selecting a printer, check if it is the desired one, retry, ... Advantage: Space Disadvantage: Limited printer information, so that it has to be provided additionally Note: Technically, there is no control available within OpenOffice.org which provides such capabilities. |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrinterSelection_Table.JPG|300px]] | '''Simple Table''' Advantages: * Good overview * Both printer selection and printer information combined in one element Disadvantage: * Space required |- | (no mockup) | '''Printer Information Text''' Use a sentence for printer information which can be placed separately from the printer selection. * Example: "Printer '''kyocera''' (Kyocera FS-1750 laser with duplex) at location '''Meeting Room 217/R15''' has the status '''Offline'''" * Example (location not available): "Printer '''kyocera''' (Kyocera FS-1750 laser with duplex) has the status '''Offline'''" * Example (comment, location not available): "Printer '''kyocera''' has the status '''Offline'''" * Advantages: Compact, “humane” kind of information presentation, unavailable information can be omitted easily * Disadvantages: According Philipp, it is impossible to easily concatenate the string for all languages, so we would end up with about 15 strings which might cause high effort for the translation. |} Comments: * According to Philipp, gathering the meta information might cause problems in large network environments. When using Windows or Linux, each of the available (network) printers has be "installed" to be usable for printing. On Solaris, things are pretty different, since all of the available printers (up to thousands) will be made instantly available. That would mean querying a lot of printers at the same time ... The OpenSolaris Presto GUI spec (see [[Printerpullpages#Competitive_Analysis|Competitive Analysis]]) does not mention such a problem, but maybe OpenOffice.org behaves different. ==== Visualization of Printed Pages in the Print Preview ==== Requirements: * The system should make efficient use of screen space. (Example: Resizing of the dialog should resize the preview accordingly). * If the print print preview calculation and drawing requires a long time, then the system should provide sufficient feedback. (long time: >= 200 ms; sufficient feedback: e.g. a progress element in the middle of the print preview page) * The system should explain the print preview, if the content could cause confusion by the user. (Example: Calc might cause empty pages for certain print ranges, why not explain why the page is empty?) * The system should provide a high quality graphics output for the visualization. (high quality visualization: e.g. fast and flicker free drawing, smooth changes between portrait and landscape formats, ...) * Explicitly not required: preview which can be manually zoomed by the user Ideas: {| class="prettytable" border="0" | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreview_Working.JPG|200px]] | '''Working''' Idea for showing that the printer preview is generated, e.g. if it takes longer than 500 ms: * Fade to white * Show progress symbol (refer to picture) * Fade to page |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreview_EmptyPage.JPG|200px]] | '''Empty Page''' Could be shown if there are "special" pages in the document, e.g.: * Writer: Empty pages automatically inserted for certain page breaks * Calc: Empty pages because of certain print ranges Note: This time, the smaller rectangle represents the page. |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreview_3D.JPG|200px]] | '''Print Preview 3D''' Shows the print preview as a 3D stack of paper including a smooth animation when another sheet is selected. The kind of visualization is pretty similar to Apple's Cover Flow. |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreview_3D_Duplex.JPG|200px]] | '''Print Preview 3D with Duplex''' Supplements "Print Preview 3D", but here the print preview consists of two 3D stacks of paper for duplex printing. Here, we go more towards the "real" print output. |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreview_3D_Duplex_LongSided.JPG|300px]] | '''Print Preview 3D with Duplex Long Sided Bind''' Supplements "Print Preview 3D", but here the print preview shows the selected page binding for duplex printing. From experience it is known, that people are confused by "long side binding" and "short side binding", because the final output is dependent on the format of the page. Example: If the user wants to see the next page, then the lower print page is "virtually" turned and put down at the upper stack. Note: Here, the rest of the dialog should just show the print options - this isn't a final version. |} ==== Navigating Pages in the Print Preview ==== Requirements: * The system must make it possible to navigate one print page forward. * The system must make it possible to navigate one page backward. * The system should provide a function to jump to a certain print page. * The system must provide an information about the number of printed pages. * The system must provide an information what print page is visualized. * The system should provide an information which can be understood with low effort. (Example: Visual representation that the currently shown page is at about the half of the full print page stack.) * The system should provide a function to navigate to a certain print page. (Example: Entering the print page number.) * The system should minimize effort for navigating between subsequent print pages. (Example: Both minimizing mouse travel and providing large controls for forward / backward navigation.) Control Elements (some comments not to get lost): * Horizontal scroll bar: Scroll bars satisfy many of the requirements but have to be used for continuous content. If they are used for other things, we may get publicity soon ... on same “bad UI design web pages” ;-). * Slider: There is a slider available in OpenOffice.org which is currently used for the media player. In the current state, this element shouldn't be used – it seems to lack basic things like keyboard navigation or proper “flicker free” visualization. Nor is it themed for different operating systems. In general, it is hard to select individual pages and the area for “grabbing” the control is very small. Otherwise, they provide excellent feedback about the position inside the document. Ideas: {| class="prettytable" border="0" |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreviewNavigation_SimpleButtons.JPG|200px]] | '''Simple Buttons''' How will this work??? :-) Advantages: * Simple * Similar to print preview controls * reduced mouse travel when jumping forward/backward |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreviewNavigation_SliderPlusButtons.JPG|200px]] | '''Slider Plus Buttons''' Similar to horizontal scrollbar Advantages: * Shows position in the paper stack * Clear shape of buttons Disadvantage: Size of paper stack isn't visulized (in comparison to scrollbar) |- | [[Image:cwsprinterpullpages_2009-06-14_Ideas_PrintPreviewNavigation_VideoRecorderControl.JPG|200px]] | '''Some kind of "Video Recorder Control"''' Advantage: Very flexible Disadvantage: New control in OOo with completely new behavior, maybe users will just confused... |- | (no mockup) | '''Navigator''' Navigate to important elements in the document, if the print layout makes it hard to check a certain page (e.g. 4-up printing, only left pages). Writer: headings, ...; Calc: spreadsheet names; Impress: page names; ... |} ==== N-up printing ==== work in progress: writer's page preview is kept, but the N-Up configuration of the "page preview" gets removed completely. The general N-Up printing facility now provides this functionality. Additionally the "print preview" button gets its text replaced by "print document" as you do not print the page preview, but the document the page preview is a viewing. === Native Print Dialog === ''nothing yet'' [[Category:User Experience]]

Return to Printerpullpages/Design Proposals.