Difference between revisions of "WindowsVista"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Other Stuff)
(Other Stuff)
Line 43: Line 43:
  
 
   Update:
 
   Update:
   The specification for thumbnails on FreeDesktop.org (http://jens.triq.net/thumbnail-spec/directory.html) seams to be
+
   The specification for thumbnails on FreeDesktop.org (http://jens.triq.net/thumbnail-spec/directory.html) seems to be
 
   non-full-negotiable to OOo. First this specification is in status draft ... second it adress thumbnails available on the file system
 
   non-full-negotiable to OOo. First this specification is in status draft ... second it adress thumbnails available on the file system
 
   ("... This is the .thumbnails directory located in the users home. ...") But here we are talking about an image representation
 
   ("... This is the .thumbnails directory located in the users home. ...") But here we are talking about an image representation

Revision as of 17:18, 27 November 2006

Preparations for Windows Vista

Search and Organization

  • The native FileOpen/Save dialogs are used to support virtual folders

Security

User Account Control (UAC)

  • The installation and update is fully UAC aware and performs the proper elevation to an administrator account
  • There are no known UAC issues during runtime

Speech recognition

Windows Logo Program

a lot of stuff comes with the Windows Logo Programs

Other Stuff

  This works fine for Windows Vista and Windows XP. Because those icons are used also on other platforms
  (and we do not wish to have more then one icon inside the same file) we have to test Windows 98, KDE, Gnome also.
  E.g. FreeDesktop.Org recommend using of 128x128 as pixel size ... but first test showed that there isnt a real problem
  using other resolutions. Further tests are planned.
  Update:
  The specification for thumbnails on FreeDesktop.org (http://jens.triq.net/thumbnail-spec/directory.html) seems to be
  non-full-negotiable to OOo. First this specification is in status draft ... second it adress thumbnails available on the file system
  ("... This is the .thumbnails directory located in the users home. ...") But here we are talking about an image representation
  retrieved from the file itself showing the content of the file. That's slightly different. Further it's not sure if specifications
  of FreeDesktop.org can be applied to OOo in general. OOo is available on Linux - yes. But it's also available for other platforms
  (Windows, Solaris etcpp). Can FreeDesktop.org realy deal with that ?
  Seams that the specification for OOo Thumbnails (http://specs.openoffice.org/appwide/desktop_integration/ooo_file_thumbnails.sxw) must
  be changed to make it more clear.
  • Security
    • Digitally signing of all executables and DLL's
  • Vista 64Bit
    • Shell extensions for Vista 64 Bit must be also compiled as 64 Bit components.
  It's no problem to run a 32 bit compiled executable on a 64 bit Vista machine.
  But that's not true for shell extensions which are started within the context of the
  windows explorer. Because the explorer itself is compiled as 64 bit component it requires
  that all used libraries (at least a shell extension will be such library) must be 64 bit ready also.
  Analyzing the code we found out, that there is only a small dependency back to the set of office libraries.
  (zip, stlport). So it seams not be a big problem to have 64 bit shell extensions combined with a 32 bit office.
  That's are the results of searching a suitable 64bit compiler for windows:
  Only the newest Visual Studio 2005 is ready to compile C++ 64bit code. Further only versions >= Visual Studio 2005 Standard
  will support that.
  see also "http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hs24szh9(VS.80).aspx".
  The newest compiler supported by the StarOffice/OpenOffice build environment is Visual Studio 2003.
  So compiling 64bit components require a switch to the new compiler (at least partially).
Personal tools