Difference between revisions of "Website/news"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
(→In the Media) |
(→In the Media) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">27 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">27 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/entdev/article.php/3729946 OOo & Foss for small businesses]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">26 Feb.</td> | <td class="headcol">26 Feb.</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://nothickmanuals.info/doku.php/articles:ooobab Extensions the easy way]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">26 Feb.</td> | <td class="headcol">26 Feb.</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39348282,00.htm Google: OOXML "insufficient & unnecessary"]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">26 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">26 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Past-News/Open-XML-Incompatible-With-GPL/ OOXML incompatible with GPL]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">25 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">25 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://www.fanaticattack.com/2008/switching-office-suites-from-microsoft-office-to-openofficeorg.html Switching to OOo]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">25 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">25 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080224143425160 Why the OOXML vote matters]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9876090-39.html MSFT's patent threats]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1207 MSFT's proclamation analysed]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/02/15/xml_tenth_anniversary/ Bray: Recalling team XML]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">21 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://www.theopensourcerer.com/ On OOXML ...]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td class="headcol">20 Feb. </td> | <td class="headcol">20 Feb. </td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>[http://documentfreedom.org/News/20080220 Document Freedom Day 03/26/08 ]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 28 February 2008
OpenOffice.org News
Ongoing
- Developer Blogs
- Marketing Blog
- Newsletter
- Independent Reviews
- Deployments
- Market Share
In the Media
| 27 Feb. | OOo & Foss for small businesses |
| 26 Feb. | Extensions the easy way |
| 26 Feb. | Google: OOXML "insufficient & unnecessary" |
| 26 Feb. | OOXML incompatible with GPL |
| 25 Feb. | Switching to OOo |
| 25 Feb. | Why the OOXML vote matters |
| 21 Feb. | MSFT's patent threats |
| 21 Feb. | MSFT's proclamation analysed |
| 21 Feb. | Bray: Recalling team XML |
| 21 Feb. | On OOXML ... |
| 20 Feb. | Document Freedom Day 03/26/08 |
