Difference between revisions of "User talk:BMarcelly"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
m (idlml) |
m (→idlml) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The problem with the <nowiki><idlml></nowiki> tag is not a syntax error, but rather an upgrade error, left over from the move to Apache. According to Clayton, the <nowiki><idlml></nowiki> tag was added to the idl extension at a later date. Apparently, the installers picked up an earlier version, without that code. There is still hope that they can find the later version, and install it. I suggest that you needn't bother fixing the entries, unless they're in your way. Otherwise, we can always go back and "un-fix" them, if we get the extension working properly. --[[User:TJFrazier|TJ]] ([[User_talk:TJFrazier|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TJFrazier|Contribs]]) 00:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | The problem with the <nowiki><idlml></nowiki> tag is not a syntax error, but rather an upgrade error, left over from the move to Apache. According to Clayton, the <nowiki><idlml></nowiki> tag was added to the idl extension at a later date. Apparently, the installers picked up an earlier version, without that code. There is still hope that they can find the later version, and install it. I suggest that you needn't bother fixing the entries, unless they're in your way. Otherwise, we can always go back and "un-fix" them, if we get the extension working properly. --[[User:TJFrazier|TJ]] ([[User_talk:TJFrazier|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TJFrazier|Contribs]]) 00:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I understand. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I changed the tags because it hampers the reading of a difficult subject. These unrecognized tags have been there for too long time. ---- | ||
Revision as of 10:06, 8 June 2012
idlml
Hi, Bernard,
The problem with the <idlml> tag is not a syntax error, but rather an upgrade error, left over from the move to Apache. According to Clayton, the <idlml> tag was added to the idl extension at a later date. Apparently, the installers picked up an earlier version, without that code. There is still hope that they can find the later version, and install it. I suggest that you needn't bother fixing the entries, unless they're in your way. Otherwise, we can always go back and "un-fix" them, if we get the extension working properly. --TJ (Talk | Contribs) 00:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
I understand.
I changed the tags because it hampers the reading of a difficult subject. These unrecognized tags have been there for too long time. ----
