Difference between revisions of "User Experience/ToDo/Competitor Software"

Revision as of 03:24, 10 November 2008

The aim of this page is to provide an analysis of useful features from competitor software. Competing software includes:

• Adobe InDesign CS3
• Adobe Acrobat Professional
• Apple iWorks
• Microsoft Office
• IBM Lotus Symphony
• various web-pages
• specific controls:
  • Adobe Type Manager: group fonts
• ... please expand

Table Styles

Virtually every table on the net uses the following specific design:

Design

• header row: a background color is set
• table-rows:
  • two alternating backgrounds
  • usually NO hard-borders, but usually light borders
• highlight current row: interactive programs (aka web) implement this feature, too
• slightly rounded corners: sometimes a pretty cheap but visually pleasing effect

Competitor Software

• virtually every web table, including the OOo and Mozilla issue-lists use these web-proven designs.
• Adobe InDesign CS3:
  • Be more productive -> Full featured tables paragraph:
  • flash demo: see the whole demo

Usability

• Writer: implement such a table style (NO issue yet filed)
• Calc: implement a Spreadsheet-Table View, see issue 78181
  • including different header style, alternating background for data-rows and highlight current row
• Impress: highlight current row/ current area, see issue 79882

Styles & Themes

• iWork: professional looking styles & themes out of the box
• MS Office 2007: also professional looking styles & themes out of the box
  • Using these two products you have to almost struggle to create ugly documents
  • No confusion caused by multiple simultaneous pragmas (strong manual editing support vs styles based)
  • Themes format styles automatically, which means extremely easy switching of the whole look
• OOo is very poor on this area!

Side-by-Side Difference between 2 Documents

Many web-programs allow displaying side-by-side differences for 2 text-streams.

Design

• compute differences between 2 versions of a document (or even 2 completely different documents)
• choose difference-sensitivity: text-only, other-objects, formats, ...
• display the 2 pages side-by-side, when issue 1598 gets implemented.

Competitor Software

• Adobe Acrobat Professional implements this feature
  • it does a great job (including +/- formatting), even though pdf is such a poor format when it comes to page structure
• various web-programs/diff's: including mediawiki/wikipedia and many more
• various text-editors
• the BLAST-program: see the ncbi BLAST page

Usability

See issue 81526 for further details.

Context sensitivity

• Two types of controls (toolbar or anything else): fixed, which always have the same options; and dynamic, which, depending on the current context, shows different options (like Symphony's side-panel)
• Microsoft Office 2007 introduces a contextual spell checker.

Toolbars and tool dialogs

Inspector (Apple iWork)

Apple's iWork has a concept of "Inspector", which is context sensitive, but with static set of tabs/controls.

It's not a toolbar, but a floating window with tabs. See formatting document movie (Quicktime)

So for example you can select one or more graphical shapes (and tex boxes) and set from the inspector their X/Y position on page or their width and height. Also colors for any object (border/fill) can be changed etc.

Contextual Format Bar (Apple iWork)

If more toolbar-like UI is desired, then there's Contextual Format Bar (Quicktime)

Extension Manager

Firefox 3's extension manager has a search box, so the user can search and install a extension direct for the program. This is very easy to use and very productive.