Difference between revisions of "User:Regina/MYDrafts4"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Problems with draw:gradient)
(Problems with draw:gradient)
Line 127: Line 127:
  
 
= Problems with <tt>draw:gradient</tt>=
 
= Problems with <tt>draw:gradient</tt>=
 +
 +
== draw:angle ==
  
 
== draw:style="radial" ==
 
== draw:style="radial" ==

Revision as of 22:08, 14 August 2012

Problems With Angle and Gradient Definitions in ODF1.2



Missing Definition of Orientation

ODF1.2 specification does not proper define orientation for drawings. Here are two suggestions.

Coordinate System

There are two common ways to orientate a Cartesian coordinate system.

mathematical orientation
screen orientation

Only when the orientation is determined, terms like "clockwise" are unambigious. Such orientation rule is missing in ODF 1.2.

Suggestion:

If a rule refers to a two-dimensional coordinate system, a Cartesian coordinate system in screen orientation (see figure ##) is used. The directions "clockwise", "counter clockwise", and the edge descriptions "left", "top", "right" and "button" are accordingly defined as shown in figures [##] to [##].

clockwise rotation of the vector (5 2) to vector (2 5)
The rectangle has the "top-left" vertex (1│2) and the "bottom-right" vertex (6│5).

Positive Orientation

This proposals is based on comments by Armin Le Grand on the mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org.

A rotation around the origin has a positive orientation, if it moves the point (1|0) from the positive part of the X-axis over the first quadrant of the coordinate system towards the point (0|1) on the positive part of the Y-axis. A rotation with positive orientation is described by a positive angle.

Advantage: This definition is independent of the orientation of the coordinate system. It leads on a coordinate system with “screen orientation” also to a clockwise rotation for a positive rotation angle.

PositiveDirectionMathematicalOrientation.png
PositiveDirectionScreenOrientation.png
Same definition by "moving from point (1|0) over first quadrant"


Errors in Attribute draw:transform

These suggestions are all about section 19.228. (Because of the Wiki markup I skipped the characters < and >).

I suggest to give for each single transformation value an example with reference to the corresponding transformation matrix and illustrate that example .

Original Problems and Suggestions
rotation by rotate-angle degrees AOO, LO and Microsoft Office use the angle in rad not in deg.

Suggestion:

Adapt ODF1.2 to the practice. Specify unit rad for values rotate, skewX and skewY in attribute draw:transform.

Deprecate the attribute draw:transform and use attribute svg:transform instead in ODF1.3.

The whole original text is very near to SVG section 7, but a reference is missing.
matrix(a b c d e f), specifies a transformation in the form of a transformation matrix of six values. "The values describe a standard 3x2 homogeneous transformation matrix in column-major order, where the right column (e, f) describes the translation. Typo: The quotation mark before 'The values' has to be removed.

Problem: A standalone translation needs parameter with units. Here this rule is missing.

Suggestion: Add the sentence:

The values e and f are lengths (18.3.18).

rotate(rotate-angle), specifies a rotation by rotate-angle degrees about the origin of the shapes coordinate system. The orientation of the rotation is missing. I suggest not to use "clockwise" but to define it by an equivalent matrix.

Suggestion:

Example: The value rotate(30) corresponds to the transformation matrix

result of value rotate(30)
scale( sx [ sy ]), specifies a scale operation by sx and sy. It is not clear, that not only the object is scaled.

Suggestion:

Example: The value scale(0.2 0.5) corresponds to the transformation matrix

result of scale(0.2 0.5). Notice that visually the distances to the axes are scaled too.
skewX(skew-angle), specifies a skew transformation by rotate-angle degrees along the x-axis. Typo: "rotate-angle" should be "skew-angle". (Already tracked in OFFICE-3755.)

Here is neither clear between which rays the angle is measured, nor what direction is used.

Suggestion:

Example: The value skewX(25) corresponds to the transformation matrix

A rectangle transformed with skewX(25). This transformation is also known as "shear mapping".
skewY(skew-angle), specifies a skew transformation by rotate-angle degrees along the y-axis. Same as skewX, typo "rotate-angle" and unclear angle.

Suggestion:

Example: The value skewY(15) corresponds to the transformation matrix

A rectangle transformed with skewY(15)
translate( tx [ty]), specifies a translation by tx and ty, where tx and ty are lengths (18.3.18). In contrast to the other transformations, the parameters need a unit here. Therefore an example is useful.

Suggestion:

Example: The value translate(2.5cm 1cm) corresponds to the transformation matrix

A rectangle transformed with translate(2.5cm 1cm)

Problems with draw:gradient

draw:angle

draw:style="radial"

ODF 1.2 specifies in section 19.218.2 <draw:gradient>

"radial: defines a gradient where the colors are blend along the radius from the center of a circle as defined with the draw:cx and draw:cy attributes. The outside of the circle is filled with the end color."

Problem: Size of the circle

It is not clear, how large the circle is. Variants:

(1) The length of the diameter of the circle equals the length of the diameter of the bounding box, independent of the position of the center of the circle

(2) The length of the diameter of the circle equals the length of the shorter edge of the bounding box, independent of the position of the center of the circle

(3) The length of the diameter of the circle equals the length of the larger edge of the bounding box, independent of the position of the center of the circle

(4) The length of the radius of the circle equals the largest distance from the center of the circle to a corner of the bounding box.

(5) The length of the radius of the circle equals the smallest distance from the center of the circle to a corner of the bounding box.

All variants refer to the bounding box. Therefor that has to be defined too. Because the term "bounding box" is used in other places too, a common definition is needed.

Apache OpenOffice uses method (1).

Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 seems to use method (4) for the ppt file format.

The length of the diameter of the circle equals the length of the diameter of the bounding box, independent of the position of the center of the circle.


Solution

Add sentence (1)

Problem: Direction of blending

Original Problems and Solutions
radial: defines a gradient where the colors are blend along the radius from the center of a circle as defined with the draw:cx and draw:cy attributes. The outside of the circle is filled with the end color. The implementations Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice blend from start color outside the circle to the end color in the center of the circle.

There are a lot of documents out, that use the blending direction from out to inside, so changing the standard to the reality would be reasonable. On the other hand defining blending from center to outside corresponds to the definition in SVG and CSS3, which makes the current rule in ODF1.2 reasonable too. ODF1.1 has no setting for the direction.

End color and start color are not simply exchangeable, because the attribute draw:border depends on the setting of the start color.

No solution yet.

Ideas:

(1) Let the current attribute values as vague as in ODF1.1 and let application handle them as they want. Add additional values in ODF1.3 with exact description of the directions in a way that it corresponds to the SVG standard. The old values can be marked 'deprecated'.

(2) Add a parameter for ODF1.3 (as it is possible in CSS3), which determines the direction, so that it is unambiguous for new documents. And say, that the direction depends on the application and its drawing engine, if the parameter is missing, so that older documents can be used as now.

(3) Change the ODF1.2 standard to the actual existing implementations.



draw:style="square"

ODF 1.2 specifies in section 19.218.2 <draw:gradient>

"square: defines a gradient that produces a square blend, imitating the visual perspective in a corridor or the aerial view of a pyramid. Also known as "box gradient" and "pyramidal gradient". The center of the square is defined with the draw:cx and draw:cy attributes. The width and height of the square is the minimum value of either the width or the height of the filled area. The outside of the square is filled with the end color. "

Problem: Reference "filled area"

Original Problems and Solutions
The width and height of the square is the minimum value of either the width or the height of the filled area. Problem: The "width or the height of the filled area" is undefined for an object with combined subpathes.

Solution: Do not use "filled area" as reference but "bounding box".

The object has three combined subpathes.

Problem: Size of the square

Original Problems and Solutions
The width and height of the square is the minimum value of either the width or the height of the filled area. Problem: Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice do not use the minimum but the maximum value.

Solution: Change "minimum" to "maximum" and use the bounding box as reference.

File:SquareMultiObjectsBoundingBoxShot.png
The longer edge of the bounding box equals the edge of the square, independent of the position of the center.

Problem: Direction of blending

There are the same problems as for the value "radial".


draw style "linear"

Original in 19.218.2 draw:gradient

Linear: defines a gradient where the colors blend along the linear axis of the gradient. The axis of the gradient is specified with the draw:angle attribute clockwise to the vertical axis.

Original in 19.122 draw:angle

The draw:angle attribute specifies an angle that rotates the axis at which the gradient values are interpolated.

Problems

(1) Typo: The attribute value "linear" should be completely in lower case as the other values.

(2) It is unclear in which direction the colors blend, it could be "from top to bottom" in visual description or "in positive y-axis direction" in mathematical description. A description "from top to bottom" would need an additional rule about the y-axis orientation.

File:LinearGradientWithUnclearDirection.png
Missing rule for directions allows different interpretation of blending.

(3) Without a rule about the y-axis orientation the mathematical operation “rotation” from 19.218.2 draw:angle might conflict with the visual description “clockwise” in 19.218.2 draw:gradient.

File:PositiveGradientRotationMathematical.png
Rotation by +30deg, if mathematical orientation is assumed
File:PositiveGradientRotationVisualClockwise.png
Rotation by +30deg, if screen orientation is assumed
Personal tools