Difference between revisions of "UNO @since Tags"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| <code>@since UDK 3.2.10</code> | | <code>@since UDK 3.2.10</code> | ||
| OOo 3.1 | | OOo 3.1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | <code>@since UDK 3.2.11</code> | ||
+ | | OOo 3.2 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 70: | Line 73: | ||
| OOo 3.1.1 | | OOo 3.1.1 | ||
| URE 1.5.1 | | URE 1.5.1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | OOo 3.2.0 | ||
+ | | URE 1.6.0 | ||
|} | |} | ||
The information on this page will be updated over time. Also see http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=12294 for further information. | The information on this page will be updated over time. Also see http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=12294 for further information. | ||
[[Category:Development]] | [[Category:Development]] |
Revision as of 11:07, 6 February 2009
OOo-related UNO documentation (i.e., for URE or SDK) uses @since
tags for autodoc
(C++, UNOIDL) and javadoc
(Java) to specify that certain documented entities are only available from a given OOo or URE version onward.
For UNOIDL documentation, the @since
tags are written “@since OOo
x.
y.
z” denoting OOo version x.y.z.
For C++ and Java documentation, the @since
tags are as follows:
@since UDK 3.0.1
|
OOo 1.0.z |
@since UDK 3.1.0
|
OOo 1.1.z |
@since UDK 3.2.0
|
OOo 2.0.0 |
@since UDK 3.2.1
|
OOo 2.0.1 |
@since UDK 3.2.2
|
OOo 2.0.2 |
@since UDK 3.2.3
|
OOo 2.0.3 |
@since UDK 3.2.4
|
OOo 2.0.4 |
@since UDK 3.2.5
|
OOo 2.1 |
@since UDK 3.2.6
|
OOo 2.2 |
@since UDK 3.2.7
|
OOo 2.3 |
@since UDK 3.2.8
|
OOo 2.4 |
@since UDK 3.2.9
|
OOo 3.0 |
@since UDK 3.2.10
|
OOo 3.1 |
@since UDK 3.2.11
|
OOo 3.2 |
For reference, the relation between OOo versions and URE versions is as follows:
OOo 2.0.0 | URE 1.0 |
OOo 2.0.2 | URE 1.1 |
OOo 2.2 | URE 1.2 |
OOo 2.3 | URE 1.3 |
OOo 3.0.0 | URE 1.4.0 |
OOo 3.0.1 | URE 1.4.1 |
OOo 3.1.0 | URE 1.5.0 |
OOo 3.1.1 | URE 1.5.1 |
OOo 3.2.0 | URE 1.6.0 |
The information on this page will be updated over time. Also see http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=12294 for further information.