Difference between revisions of "The Three Golden Rules for Writing OpenOffice.org Specifications"
m (→R2 [CLEAR]:)
m (Added category)
|Line 37:||Line 37:|
Revision as of 05:00, 10 July 2008
Goal of this document:
These three rules shall assist specification authors writing specifications.
Specification authors, specification reviewers (Development , Quality Assurance , User Experience, Documentation
Send Feedback to:
dev at specs dot openoffice dot org
Each of the following rules [R] is accompanied by a couple of checklist questions. The optimum is to answer all of the questions with 'Yes'.
First and foremost a specification has to be complete. That means all relevant aspects of a feature have been captured. When user interfaces (UI) are involved:
- Are the topics of the Accessibility Checklist covered?
- Are the topics of the Globalization Checklist covered?
- Are the topics of the Interface Text Style Guide checklist covered?
- Do alerts meet the requirements specified in the Alert Guidelines?
- Are all menu related changes specified in the Comprehensive OpenOffice.org Menu specification?
- Are all tool bar related changes specified in the Comprehensive OpenOffice.org Tool bar specification?
- Is each UI element specified in detail (e.g default values, input and output ranges, interactions and possible relations to other UI elements and parts of the UI)?
- Is the exception handling specified in detail?
- Each statement has to be unambiguously clear to Development , Quality Assurance, User Experience and Documentation.
- Is the specification in itself clear enough to the intended readership for being implemented, being tested and for being documented?
- Are you using quantifiable statements instead of interpretable generalities?
- Have you avoided to use terms like “more”, “most”, “less”, “easy”, “improve”, “enhanced”, “better”?
- Are you consistent within the specification and to specifications which relate to the feature you are specifying?
- Each statement shall be as short and simple as possible.
Is any secondary writing regarding the detailed specification clearly separated e.g. “comments”, “notes”, “suggestions”, “ideas”, “reasons”?