Difference between revisions of "Talk:Why"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Brainstorming: Other sections/areas/ideas for WHY.OOo)
m (Brainstorming: Other sections/areas/ideas for WHY.OOo)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Brainstorming: Other sections/areas/ideas for WHY.OOo ==
 
== Brainstorming: Other sections/areas/ideas for WHY.OOo ==
  
There might be other sections or ideas needed at some point and to be presented in the why.openoffice.org site. <b>To add to this list:</b> Login, [[http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/mwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Why&action=edit&section=1 | edit]] this talk and place them with bullets here. It's brainstorming and any idea is good. Might come in handy later.
+
There might be other sections or ideas needed at some point and to be presented in the why.openoffice.org site. <b>To add to this list:</b> Login, [[http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/mwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Why&action=edit&section=1 edit]] this talk and place them with bullets here. It's brainstorming and any idea is good. Might come in handy later.
  
 
* Section for those preparing to argument and give speach to a certain target market ? I mean, having links to the best materials argumenting Why... for a certain market. In the same idea, how about podcasts to listen while traveling to the meeting ? ([[User:Cdriga|Cdriga]] 17:57, 22 April 2006 (CEST))
 
* Section for those preparing to argument and give speach to a certain target market ? I mean, having links to the best materials argumenting Why... for a certain market. In the same idea, how about podcasts to listen while traveling to the meeting ? ([[User:Cdriga|Cdriga]] 17:57, 22 April 2006 (CEST))
 
* Countering the missleading arguments used by the competition: There is a lot of FUD and a lot of missleading arguments brought in especially by MSFT when it comes to why MSFT and NOT OOo. We must have clear responses to give in an open debate when trying to convince ([[User:Cdriga|Cdriga]] 17:57, 22 April 2006 (CEST))
 
* Countering the missleading arguments used by the competition: There is a lot of FUD and a lot of missleading arguments brought in especially by MSFT when it comes to why MSFT and NOT OOo. We must have clear responses to give in an open debate when trying to convince ([[User:Cdriga|Cdriga]] 17:57, 22 April 2006 (CEST))

Revision as of 16:01, 22 April 2006

Brainstorming: Other sections/areas/ideas for WHY.OOo

There might be other sections or ideas needed at some point and to be presented in the why.openoffice.org site. To add to this list: Login, [edit] this talk and place them with bullets here. It's brainstorming and any idea is good. Might come in handy later.

  • Section for those preparing to argument and give speach to a certain target market ? I mean, having links to the best materials argumenting Why... for a certain market. In the same idea, how about podcasts to listen while traveling to the meeting ? (Cdriga 17:57, 22 April 2006 (CEST))
  • Countering the missleading arguments used by the competition: There is a lot of FUD and a lot of missleading arguments brought in especially by MSFT when it comes to why MSFT and NOT OOo. We must have clear responses to give in an open debate when trying to convince (Cdriga 17:57, 22 April 2006 (CEST))
Personal tools