Difference between revisions of "Talk:Website/Requirements"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
OK, I'm done for now. :) | OK, I'm done for now. :) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree. It need not be just competitors, although the IBM competitors criteria can work for all sites. I would like to suggest some Corporate sites that probably have had some of the best professional designers working on them. I will be back with a list of links that caught *my* eye. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Regards Bill Case | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 8 November 2007
Sites We Like (that possibly do a better job)
I'm just wondering if we could possibly start a list of sites we think are better in terms of dealing with the typical "end user".
Here's some open source sites I think do a pretty good job with dealing with end-users:
openSuse has very recently gone over to this VERY simple format
This is a VERY user-centric site with many other links going elsewhere
OK, WAY too wordy, probably, but this is a developer system, not a typical end-user application. Still the general layout has some merit I think
OK, I'm done for now. :)
I agree. It need not be just competitors, although the IBM competitors criteria can work for all sites. I would like to suggest some Corporate sites that probably have had some of the best professional designers working on them. I will be back with a list of links that caught *my* eye.
Regards Bill Case
