Difference between revisions of "Talk:User Experience/DirectManipulationSnippets"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
(added suggestion on fields) |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like this effort in adding direct manipulation support. I'd suggest, however, you include fields in the design. For example, ODF 1.2 will be getting a new generic metadata field which we hope to use in the bibliographic project for citations and bibliographic entries. This generic field might be a good candidate for a direct manipulation UI? -- Bruce D'Arcus | I like this effort in adding direct manipulation support. I'd suggest, however, you include fields in the design. For example, ODF 1.2 will be getting a new generic metadata field which we hope to use in the bibliographic project for citations and bibliographic entries. This generic field might be a good candidate for a direct manipulation UI? -- Bruce D'Arcus | ||
| + | |||
| + | I hope this ends up in OpenOffice. I really, really like the idea. -- Mirek2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | == What about the other applications == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks very nice but please do not focus on writer only. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:55, 1 July 2008
I like this effort in adding direct manipulation support. I'd suggest, however, you include fields in the design. For example, ODF 1.2 will be getting a new generic metadata field which we hope to use in the bibliographic project for citations and bibliographic entries. This generic field might be a good candidate for a direct manipulation UI? -- Bruce D'Arcus
I hope this ends up in OpenOffice. I really, really like the idea. -- Mirek2
What about the other applications
Looks very nice but please do not focus on writer only.
