Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tips"
| (17 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I've added a link to the original cvs faq, because in my opinion this wiki page is seriously lacking. It does not even mention anonymous (read-only) access, which I was looking for, and does not really describe how to get an account (only has a link to how to get a different ooo-build account). Also it's unstructured and not quite clearly-written. Until it's improved I think a link to the original page is most useful. Also the page should be renamed. "CVS Guide" comes to mind for example. It also has a number of formatting errors (in the patch/diff section). I can't quite follow the original intentions of the author to fix it. Or maybe http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.3/source.html should just link to [[Getting It]] instead of this page. Getting It is concise and I think it is more in line with one expects to find when trying to check out the source from cvs. --[[User:Cyhawk|Cyhawk]] 17:52, 24 August 2006 (CEST) | |
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | + | I've added a translated version of this page. HTH to Chinese developers.--[[User:Zhangxiaofei|Zhangxiaofei]] 13:09, 12 August 2007 (CEST) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [ | + | |
| − | [ | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [ | + | |
| − | [ | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [ | + | |
| − | [ | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 11:21, 28 September 2007
I've added a link to the original cvs faq, because in my opinion this wiki page is seriously lacking. It does not even mention anonymous (read-only) access, which I was looking for, and does not really describe how to get an account (only has a link to how to get a different ooo-build account). Also it's unstructured and not quite clearly-written. Until it's improved I think a link to the original page is most useful. Also the page should be renamed. "CVS Guide" comes to mind for example. It also has a number of formatting errors (in the patch/diff section). I can't quite follow the original intentions of the author to fix it. Or maybe http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.3/source.html should just link to Getting It instead of this page. Getting It is concise and I think it is more in line with one expects to find when trying to check out the source from cvs. --Cyhawk 17:52, 24 August 2006 (CEST)
I've added a translated version of this page. HTH to Chinese developers.--Zhangxiaofei 13:09, 12 August 2007 (CEST)
