Difference between revisions of "Talk:OOoArt--OOo logo license"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
(→text on logo licensing - some more thoughts) |
(→text on logo licensing - some more thoughts) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[User:Cdriga|Cdriga]] 01:05, 3 December 2005 (CET) | [[User:Cdriga|Cdriga]] 01:05, 3 December 2005 (CET) | ||
| − | Is there an actual license for use with OOo? If not, would it make sense for us to draft one? (I mean, we do have a couple of lawyer types in the house.) | + | Is there an actual license for use with the OOo logo? If not, would it make sense for us to draft one? (I mean, we do have a couple of lawyer types in the house.) |
| + | |||
[[User:Steven_Shelton|Steven_Shelton]] 09:30, 24 January 2006 (EST) | [[User:Steven_Shelton|Steven_Shelton]] 09:30, 24 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 24 January 2006
I just wrote what I thought to have understood (or wanted to understand) from Louis' logo license mail at the art project.
When we found a final text it should be uploaded to the logo gallery.
BeDipp 00:50, 3 December 2005 (CET)
text on logo licensing - some more thoughts
Things to add/keep in mind for this text and for the final rules in the Style Guide. Please tell me your opinions:
- Copyright of OpenOffice.org logo belongs to SUN Microsystems
- Upgrades of OOo logo (such as version numbers) should be done by project members that have signed JCA
Cdriga 01:05, 3 December 2005 (CET)
Is there an actual license for use with the OOo logo? If not, would it make sense for us to draft one? (I mean, we do have a couple of lawyer types in the house.)
Steven_Shelton 09:30, 24 January 2006 (EST)
