Difference between revisions of "Talk:OOoArt--OOo logo license"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(text on logo licensing - some more thoughts)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
Is there an actual license for use with OOo? If not, would it make sense for us to draft one? (I mean, we do have a couple of lawyer types in the house.)
 
Is there an actual license for use with OOo? If not, would it make sense for us to draft one? (I mean, we do have a couple of lawyer types in the house.)
 +
[[User:Steven_Shelton|Steven_Shelton]] 09:30, 24 January 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 14:31, 24 January 2006

I just wrote what I thought to have understood (or wanted to understand) from Louis' logo license mail at the art project.
When we found a final text it should be uploaded to the logo gallery.
BeDipp 00:50, 3 December 2005 (CET)

text on logo licensing - some more thoughts

Things to add/keep in mind for this text and for the final rules in the Style Guide. Please tell me your opinions:

  • Copyright of OpenOffice.org logo belongs to SUN Microsystems
  • Upgrades of OOo logo (such as version numbers) should be done by project members that have signed JCA

Cdriga 01:05, 3 December 2005 (CET)

Is there an actual license for use with OOo? If not, would it make sense for us to draft one? (I mean, we do have a couple of lawyer types in the house.) Steven_Shelton 09:30, 24 January 2006 (EST)

Personal tools