Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nikolai Pretzell"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi Nikolai, any reason why the [[Cpp_Coding_Standards]] topics come in cryptic abbreviations using ugly uppercase? Do you want to prevent anyone from reading it? ;-) --[[User:ErAck|erAck]] 13:56, 27 November 2006 (CET) | Hi Nikolai, any reason why the [[Cpp_Coding_Standards]] topics come in cryptic abbreviations using ugly uppercase? Do you want to prevent anyone from reading it? ;-) --[[User:ErAck|erAck]] 13:56, 27 November 2006 (CET) | ||
| − | When compiling the standard's items we discussed this as well. The (not so very much) cryptic abbreviations are more intended to be identifiers (with some semantic meaningfulness), less to be head lines. Identifiers are important I think. But I'd like to discuss this further. [[User:Np | Nikolai]] | + | When compiling the standard's items we discussed this as well. The (not so very much) cryptic abbreviations are more intended to be identifiers (with some semantic meaningfulness), less to be head lines. Identifiers are important I think. But I'd like to discuss this further. --[[User:Np | Nikolai]] 18:01, 27 November 2006 (CET) |
Revision as of 17:01, 27 November 2006
Hi Nikolai, any reason why the Cpp_Coding_Standards topics come in cryptic abbreviations using ugly uppercase? Do you want to prevent anyone from reading it? ;-) --erAck 13:56, 27 November 2006 (CET)
When compiling the standard's items we discussed this as well. The (not so very much) cryptic abbreviations are more intended to be identifiers (with some semantic meaningfulness), less to be head lines. Identifiers are important I think. But I'd like to discuss this further. -- Nikolai 18:01, 27 November 2006 (CET)
