Difference between revisions of "Talk:Calc/Drafts/Issue 33851"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | On the fill series part (the last bit on the page at the time of writing.), I think option 2 is most logical. I think disabling series fill is a cop out! If you go with option 2 then you can still achieve the effect of option 1 through other means (fill the visible cells with a particular value, eg. "fred", then sort the sheet so all your freds are together in a contiguous range, then fill unfiltered, as normal) whereas if you went for option 1, you cannot really achieve the effect of option 2. | + | It looks fairly sensible to me so far. |
| + | |||
| + | On the ''fill series'' part (the last bit on the page at the time of writing.), I think option 2 is most logical. I think disabling series fill is a cop out! If you go with option 2 then you can still achieve the effect of option 1 through other means (fill the visible cells with a particular value, eg. "fred", then sort the sheet so all your freds are together in a contiguous range, then fill unfiltered, as normal) whereas if you went for option 1, you cannot really achieve the effect of option 2. | ||
--[[User:Peopleandplanet.org|Peopleandplanet.org]] 18:39, 27 November 2006 (CET) | --[[User:Peopleandplanet.org|Peopleandplanet.org]] 18:39, 27 November 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 17:43, 27 November 2006
It looks fairly sensible to me so far.
On the fill series part (the last bit on the page at the time of writing.), I think option 2 is most logical. I think disabling series fill is a cop out! If you go with option 2 then you can still achieve the effect of option 1 through other means (fill the visible cells with a particular value, eg. "fred", then sort the sheet so all your freds are together in a contiguous range, then fill unfiltered, as normal) whereas if you went for option 1, you cannot really achieve the effect of option 2. --Peopleandplanet.org 18:39, 27 November 2006 (CET)
