Difference between revisions of "QA/AOO401 PVT GUI Result/r1518667 Windows7"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
< QA
Liupingtan (Talk | contribs) |
Liupingtan (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''GUI PVT''' is to simulate a common user to perform basic but core operations of each editor and count the consumed time/memory/handle after each operation | |
| − | + | ||
| − | Test Environment: | + | '''Test Environment:''' Windows7; CPU:2.6 GHz; Mem: 8GB |
| − | Test Build: AOO.4.0.1_r1518667 | + | |
| − | Test Evaluation Method:Automatically run each test case 8 times and compute the average value of 5 times (excluding the first round result, the minimum and maximum result). | + | '''Test Build:''' AOO.4.0.1_r1518667 '''Test Baseline Build:''' AOO4.0_r1503704 |
| + | |||
| + | '''Test Evaluation Method:''' Automatically run each test case 8 times | ||
| + | and compute the average value of 5 times (excluding the first round result, the minimum and maximum result). | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | About Consumed Time | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''1''' Most of result indicated that the performance had been improved especially for XLS | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''2''' Some bad result but less than 5% ,which should be acceptable | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''3''' The reference information and material data | ||
| + | |||
| + | <gallery> | ||
| + | File:GUI 2.jpg|Caption2 | ||
| + | </gallery> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Quality Assurance]] | ||
Latest revision as of 05:53, 16 September 2013
GUI PVT is to simulate a common user to perform basic but core operations of each editor and count the consumed time/memory/handle after each operation
Test Environment: Windows7; CPU:2.6 GHz; Mem: 8GB
Test Build: AOO.4.0.1_r1518667 Test Baseline Build: AOO4.0_r1503704
Test Evaluation Method: Automatically run each test case 8 times and compute the average value of 5 times (excluding the first round result, the minimum and maximum result).
About Consumed Time
1 Most of result indicated that the performance had been improved especially for XLS
2 Some bad result but less than 5% ,which should be acceptable
3 The reference information and material data
Caption2
