Difference between revisions of "Foss.in"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Only few upstream developers from India | * Only few upstream developers from India | ||
** only little free, there were some company-related (through Novell in 2003) | ** only little free, there were some company-related (through Novell in 2003) | ||
+ | * Louis talking about opportunities to make money with OpenSource (OOo) | ||
+ | ** Services | ||
+ | ** Extension development for customers | ||
+ | * Some more innovative eye-catchy documentation and introduction of OOo and contributions | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Jürgen: Programmability=== |
Revision as of 05:24, 5 December 2007
Adhoc notes from project day
Sankarshan: OOo in India
- Lack of core developer guidance and documentation
- Consolidate the efforts around providing build resources
- Arguments for promoting OOo for governmental use
- Development of local ecosystems around OOo, no need to be bound to one company or format
- Opportunity to provide localized version driven by local groups
- Only few upstream developers from India
- only little free, there were some company-related (through Novell in 2003)
- Louis talking about opportunities to make money with OpenSource (OOo)
- Services
- Extension development for customers
- Some more innovative eye-catchy documentation and introduction of OOo and contributions