Difference between revisions of "Extensions/website-todo"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
<li style='color: #D03234'>0% - Review the site layout and interface, keeping in mind that the current theme was designed only as a prototype.</li>
 
<li style='color: #D03234'>0% - Review the site layout and interface, keeping in mind that the current theme was designed only as a prototype.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 +
 +
<h3>For Milestone 3-2: Beta 2</h3>
 +
corrections, missing forgoten mandatory features
 +
 +
<h3>For Milestone 3-3: Beta 3</h3>
 +
corrections, missing forgoten mandatory features
  
 
<h3>Possibly some more beta releases....</h3>
 
<h3>Possibly some more beta releases....</h3>

Revision as of 08:42, 7 January 2007

The "Official" TODO list

Please note that everything on this page is subject to revision, and may be lacking in many regards.

For Milestone 1: Alpha

Ready for alpha review. All/Most fundamental functions should now be workable, although may be a little hacked and contrived. The user interface in many instances will be incomplete.
  • 100% - Design database layout.
  • 100% - Create dynamic listing of available extensions.
  • 100% - Allow user login <Note - Profiles not included in this entry>
  • 100% - Allow users to upload/delete/modify their extensions <NOTE: Deferring addition/removal of image previews and modification of actual extension package until next milestone>
  • 80% - Graphical administration of site < As much as is going to be done in this milestone is done>
  • 25% - Graphical install/configuration of site < As much as is going to be done in this milestone is done - more is unnecessary for an alpha review - and may never be needed >
  • 0% - Register as a new user - only login/password/email for a first shoot

For Milestone 2: Alpha 2

Fundamental functions should be well and truly established, with acceptable user interfaces. Preliminary support added for more advanced functions such as searching.
  • 0% - Complete the upload backend, and make ready for uploading of multiple previews, categories etc.
  • 0% - Polish and neaten graphical administration.
  • 0% - Preliminary search functions.
  • 25% - Add functional categories.
  • 0% - User Profiles
  • 0% - Add Graphical interface to translations <NOTE: Database already optimised for easy translation>
  • 0% - Review milestone code, adding preliminary commenting, indenting and optimisation.

For Milestone 3-1: Beta 1

First wide feedback - Advanced Features should be fully operable, and configurable. This Milestone is more of a generic review of code for security flaws and optimisations. All submited extensions would have to be preserved for subsequent changes
  • 0% - Organize user feedback.
  • 0% - Web service for extensions integration. (see Extensions update features)
  • 0% - Code Review - Make neat and tidy + streamlined.
  • 0% - Code Review - Ensure there are no security flaws.
  • 0% - Review the site layout and interface, keeping in mind that the current theme was designed only as a prototype.

For Milestone 3-2: Beta 2

corrections, missing forgoten mandatory features

For Milestone 3-3: Beta 3

corrections, missing forgoten mandatory features

Possibly some more beta releases....

For Milestone 4: Release Candidate

If all goes well, there should be no need to change much.
  • 0% - Intensive Bug Testing.
  • 0% - Fix Bugs that emerge during testing.

For Milestone 5: Code Cleanup and Final Preparation for public consumption

  • 0% - All done

Issues concerning the website which need to be decided by a vote/discussion

Just add your thoughts below, and put your signature after them.

Should the short description be a completely different field then a longer, more comprehensive one?

I vote no, because it will require more work on behalf of the user uploading the extension. I think we should make it as easy as possible for them. Note that such sites as addons.mozilla.org do not do this either. --Computerdork 23:51, 4 January 2007 (CET)

I vote yes.If no short description is given, the X first characters of the long description are taken automùatically, but the uploader should have a mean to give a head summarize. --Lgodard 09:30, 7 January 2007 (CET)

Personal tools