Community Council Log 20090625
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Revision as of 16:42, 14 December 2009 by B michaelsen (Talk | contribs)
IRC Log of Community Council Meeting 2009-06-25
Attendees
- Martin Hollmichel (_Nesshof_)
- Cor Nouws (CorNouws)
- Christian Lohmaier (cloph) - representing André Schnabel
- Pavel Janik (paveljanik)
- Stefan Taxhet (stx12)
- Matthias Huetsch (mhu)
Absent
- Louis Suárez-Potts
- Sophie Gautier
- John McCreesh
- André Schnabel
(20:40:16) CorNouws: About attendees .. (20:40:28) CorNouws: I'd rather expet Jacqueline than Sophie - but didn't see anything (20:40:28) CorNouws: Louis mailed this afternoon he *had missed* this meeting cause being in traffic or so (20:40:28) CorNouws: And John was on holidy ?? ANyway, few days earlier he was preparing to leave. But he didn't sent a notice (20:41:02) CorNouws: Any idea, someone? (20:41:19) stx12: not me... (20:41:42) mhu: no, sorry (20:42:05) _Nesshof_: no (20:44:56) CorNouws: So maybe we should start - any objections if I try to chair? (20:45:23) cloph: nope (no objections) (20:46:57) mhu: no, just go ahead (20:47:03) _Nesshof_: yes, please (20:47:15) CorNouws: ok then (20:47:17) paveljanik: yes (20:47:39) CorNouws: today's agenda : http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Agenda (20:47:45) CorNouws: seen by all? (20:48:18) paveljanik: yes (20:50:23) CorNouws: #1: List of decisions and AI's of previous meeting for approval (20:50:43) CorNouws: Approval especially for Decisions, AFAIAC (20:51:10) CorNouws: and that is not so much ;-) http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Minutes#Decisions_made (20:51:33) CorNouws: Any remarks with the AI's or log? (20:51:42) CorNouws: If not ... next item (20:52:06) mhu: fine for me (20:52:12) cloph: +1 (20:53:09) stx12: the "appointment for next meeting" is wrong ;-) (20:53:38) ***stx12 is sorry for the nitpicking... (20:53:46) stx12: next item please (20:54:03) CorNouws: Thanks (maybe that's why some miss this evening ;-) ) (20:54:03) CorNouws: BTW Sorry: I've forgotten to ask if there are any remarks or additions with the agenda (20:54:09) CorNouws: any? (20:55:01) CorNouws: OK, AI's - what is where this is all about. (20:55:12) CorNouws: 2.1.1. - no news (20:55:31) CorNouws: 2.2.1 Trademark. (20:55:34) CorNouws: Stafan? (20:55:38) CorNouws: Stefan? (20:55:55) ***CorNouws (sorry for the many typoooos) (20:56:35) stx12: I involved sun legal and got the first feedback. the best seems to be to enter direct discussion with a distro. (20:56:50) stx12: so we contacted debian. (20:57:47) CorNouws: ... and (20:58:29) stx12: with no answer yet. i would like to see a talk happen and will follow-up on this. (20:59:26) CorNouws: a talk? i.e. a meeting, IRC? (20:59:46) stx12: i guess a phone call (21:01:10) stx12: for the other bullet points that were raised see the mail to the trademark list. (21:01:45) CorNouws: Seen that, Thanks. Gives some direction. (21:01:58) CorNouws: WRT the pnone call / ..: Would it make sence to involve Bernard or others that did a lot on the current concept? (21:01:58) CorNouws: Or do you expect that it is easy to bring items accross. (21:03:15) stx12: i think we have the interesting positions at the phone. (21:03:53) stx12: if we come to a common understanding this should work in general. (21:05:31) CorNouws: I expect so. We must take care, IMO, that this route of communication is enough respectful to the others, doing a lot in the discussion so far. (21:07:40) CorNouws: One more item on this subject.. (21:07:56) CorNouws: André suggested to start the discussion in the community any way (discuss@OOo) (21:08:20) CorNouws: But looking at the planning to contact Debian shortly, that might be just to fast (21:08:41) stx12: i agree with your view (21:09:06) CorNouws: OK - are there remarks from any of the others present here? (21:09:22) paveljanik: no (21:09:24) ***cloph 's view is covered (21:10:15) CorNouws: Thanks - next item: (21:10:15) CorNouws: 2.3.1 Elections: (21:10:33) CorNouws: André made his apologies on the discuss@cc list this afternoon,forn not having done more. (21:10:33) CorNouws: I had contact with him earlier this week, and he obviously was not forgotten. (21:10:33) CorNouws: * so, I woudl suggest AI for next meeting (21:11:05) CorNouws: ok for all? (21:11:16) cloph: +1 (21:11:17) mhu: just for the records, I offered to help in some way before my vacation, and still would do so (21:11:33) mhu: (with elections, that is) (21:11:51) CorNouws: thanks Matthias. Can you contact André for that? (21:11:53) mhu: but yes, okay for me (21:11:55) ***stx12 needs help with vacation (21:12:02) mhu: :-) (21:12:25) CorNouws: little help for Stefan: 8-) (21:12:25) mhu: yes, I contact andre again (21:12:32) CorNouws: OK then, next (21:12:39) CorNouws: 2.4.1 Internship budget: (21:13:15) CorNouws: Should be done on budget list I guess, but let's look to the update (2.4.2) first ... :-\ (21:13:34) CorNouws: 2.4.2 Internship update: (21:13:34) CorNouws: There is little time for me and others to do the work needed. (21:13:56) CorNouws: So baiscally it is my idea that we are to late for this years summer period. (21:14:11) CorNouws: I mailed to marcon for vacation times - little response (21:14:19) CorNouws: link to some mails: (21:14:19) CorNouws: http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=contests&msgNo=32 (21:14:19) CorNouws: http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=pr&msgNo=2738 (21:14:19) CorNouws: http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=MarCon&msgNo=473 (21:14:29) CorNouws: So far my update. (21:14:36) CorNouws: ideas? (21:15:24) stx12: just go ahead with the pace we can and start a summer of code for the southern hemisphaere (21:16:23) mhu: ...or for the xmas break ... instead of summer (21:16:34) cloph: (for the record: /me doesn't have access to those lists) (21:17:22) CorNouws: cloph: not via the links I did send? Ah, I must be logged in :-) (21:17:28) ***mhu also has no access, as I just found out ... (21:17:50) CorNouws: Shall I forward some mails to you, Christian? (21:18:02) CorNouws: It is not really uregent for this moment, IMO (21:18:22) cloph: As I'm acting as deputy, and it is not urgent anyway: no need to forward the mails (21:18:41) CorNouws: ok. (21:19:07) CorNouws: I like Stefans and Matthias suggestions about the planning - thus we can continue for this year (21:19:22) CorNouws: Any other remarks / suggestions on this subject? (21:19:53) cloph: No other suggestion, just confirmation to continue, and not postpone to next summer. (21:20:01) mhu: maybe, we also should not limit ourselfs to students only (then we also dont need summer breaks only) (21:22:12) CorNouws: Students in the Netherlands should work on their study .. so that makes full time work for 3 months on OOo code hard ? (21:22:40) CorNouws: Sorry you wrote *not* limit (21:22:57) mhu: oh, yes. taking care of students is fine, I just think they may not be our only target (21:23:31) CorNouws: OK, let's see how it works. (21:23:48) mhu: yes, lets get a start first :-) (21:24:29) CorNouws: Good. Anyone else on this subject? (21:24:44) CorNouws: Then next item .. (21:24:53) CorNouws: 2.5.1 L10n infrastructure (21:24:53) CorNouws: Same problem: apologies from André (21:24:53) CorNouws: (they have been busy on dev@de.OOo with a 'new' discussion about QA, bugs and features and so ;-) ) (21:25:27) cloph: :-) (or :-( - depending from what POV you look at it) (21:26:01) ***CorNouws maybe some learn ... (21:26:27) CorNouws: Maybe someone else willing to lend a helping hand on the subject of infrastucture, help André? (21:26:59) CorNouws: might be superflouus, since he is contacting Florian already - so forget that for the moment ... (21:27:43) CorNouws: next item then? (21:27:43) CorNouws: Not toooo fast? (21:28:24) cloph: The mirrorbrain thing is the way to go and supports partial sets (as would bittorrent) and is a big step forward to allow for more specialized mirrors. (21:29:05) cloph: .oO(Maybe one should think about dropping localized full-builds altogether and focus on en-US full install + languagepacks for everything else) (21:29:50) CorNouws: Thanks, cloph - We'll make sure these things get noticed (21:30:20) CorNouws: (but looking at installation trouble quite some people have already, two steps might not be such a handy idea) (21:31:11) CorNouws: can we move on to 2.6.1 Project improvement page ? (21:32:39) CorNouws: There was little response on the mail to project_leads@, send by Louis (21:32:39) CorNouws: But it did lead to some additions (21:32:47) CorNouws: So the page grows, and looks already better IMO (21:33:15) CorNouws: It is really good to see that at so many places, all over the wiki, ideas are written down and worked on. (21:33:15) CorNouws: Real fun (and good, IMO) to see a collection of that. (21:33:32) ***CorNouws Now only few more hands ;-) (21:34:44) cloph: ..as always :-) (21:36:26) CorNouws: Can we move on? (21:37:35) CorNouws: ok then (21:37:35) CorNouws: 2.7.1 OpenOffice.org Certification (21:37:45) CorNouws: Did mail a draft business plan off list this afternoon. With some discussion done by mail. (21:37:45) CorNouws: (Off list, because I did not get clear from Alexandro and Evan what they would prefer at this stage) (21:37:51) CorNouws: Interesting development, AFAIAC. (21:37:51) CorNouws: Did any one already had some time to look at it? (21:38:34) stx12: sorry, i haven't had a chance to read it. (21:38:37) CorNouws: Does it make sense to you if we have a break - about 10 mins or so - to do some reading on this subject ? (21:40:10) stx12: i would prefer to read it earlier in the day and comment while being awake ;-) (21:40:47) CorNouws: already asleep ?? (21:41:05) stx12: almost... zzz (21:41:09) CorNouws: and the others ? (21:41:09) CorNouws: BTW, my mail was 19:36 CET (21:41:23) mhu: almost :-) you are awakening us all the time :-) (21:41:33) _Nesshof_: :-) (21:42:03) CorNouws: :-) (21:42:03) CorNouws: To be honest: (21:42:03) CorNouws: It is our own concern if we need months and months to organize elections ... (21:42:04) cloph: Glad that thoser IRC-clients make funny sounds when a message arrives ;-) (just kidding, not asleep yet) (21:42:11) mhu: seriously, I found it only while we already chatted (21:42:51) ***mhu needs some time to drive from office to home ... (21:42:56) CorNouws: but is is not good if we frustrate the process of others, more then necessary .. (21:42:58) ***cloph admits he is not really into the subject (21:43:52) mhu: can we have some time to read the proposal, and than discuss via email, no need to delay two / four weeks IMHO (21:44:14) CorNouws: sounds reasonable to me, thanks (21:44:25) CorNouws: how many day's do we all need? (21:44:26) mhu: thanks (21:44:55) CorNouws: need or want :-) (21:44:56) ***mhu has only ~1000 emails left over from vacation :-) (21:45:14) ***CorNouws Ctrl-A, DEL (21:45:15) mhu: I can read it tomorrow (21:45:24) mhu: :-) (21:45:40) CorNouws: _Nesshof_: ? paveljanik ? stx12 ? (21:45:55) CorNouws: cloph: understood - we'll ask André (21:46:34) stx12: until beginning of next week (21:46:47) _Nesshof_: I'm almost fine with the proposal (21:46:58) _Nesshof_: but only have read this one time (21:47:10) ***_Nesshof_ need to read it a second time (21:48:16) CorNouws: beginning of next week, so let's try Tuesday (21:48:16) CorNouws: Ok for you as well, Pavel (or must I ping pong you ;-) ) (21:49:07) CorNouws: (probably out for a moment) (21:49:28) CorNouws: I park this - come back on it later. (21:49:56) CorNouws: Items 2.8 and 2.9 - notign done :-( (21:50:15) CorNouws: 2.10 schedule (21:50:30) CorNouws: I have a request for change :-) (21:50:47) CorNouws: shall we hadle that by mail (since quite some are absent now) (21:51:24) mhu: yes, as we already have that email thread, and not all have answered anyway (21:52:41) CorNouws: That is true, but when I ask to give remarks wishes if there are any, and there is no reply, I assume it is OK (21:52:52) CorNouws: or is that far to naive ? (21:53:24) stx12: yes - naive (21:53:28) mhu: I am okay with that rule (21:53:58) mhu: ...maybe not with the outcome in cases where I am affected, but the rule is okay (21:54:08) CorNouws: rule that I am naive, or that people should behave mature and reply ;-) (21:54:41) mhu: ...that you can expect it is okay if there is no response (21:55:27) CorNouws: of course, thanks (21:55:46) _Nesshof_: mhu: yes, agreed (21:56:13) ***CorNouws Do we have something like that in our charter or rules ? shouldn't we have? (21:56:25) stx12: ... and we don't have to vote but all agree without further notice... (21:56:39) mhu: well, for me that is almost common sense (21:57:37) mhu: (my reply was to CorNouws not stx12) (21:58:40) CorNouws: The other side of the medail is, that if we really demand a reply, it is rewarding laizyness less (21:58:40) stx12: sorry for the irony, my experience days that it only works for a subset of people and subset of questions. i think only explicit confirmation make the appearance more probable. (21:59:28) mhu: yes, in general that is true, of course (21:59:30) CorNouws: stx12: same message, other words :-) (22:00:28) CorNouws: so it comes down to a balance .. (22:00:28) CorNouws: maybe we can discuss this in a few months, with new cc members, when we know how the role of coordinator works out? (22:00:30) ***mhu still thinks that with simple daily things "no response" shall always equal "default answer" (22:01:09) CorNouws: mhu: looks like a solid piece of software ;-) (22:01:20) mhu: sure :-) (22:01:50) CorNouws: So that were the AI's - thanks - apart from Pavel and Certification (22:01:56) CorNouws: See if he comes in later (22:02:13) CorNouws: Now #3 (22:02:13) CorNouws: Future with oracle, do we have ideas/whishes .. (22:02:13) CorNouws: Someone posted a slightly provocating mail (22:02:36) CorNouws: Do we want to discuss this in public :-) (22:03:16) stx12: the public answer is that the acquisition is not closed yet and sun and oracle act as separate entities. (22:03:23) _Nesshof_: hmmm, do we have wisches/ideas at this time ? (22:03:39) CorNouws: two are more than one (22:03:51) CorNouws: two is Sun and the CC (22:04:29) CorNouws: so doing good promoting of the project, should benifit of involvement of the CC, I think (22:04:54) CorNouws: also see Sophie's reply on the mail (22:05:05) CorNouws: She was the only one, I think (22:05:11) CorNouws: who replied (22:05:29) ***_Nesshof_ didn't saw any reply (22:05:40) stx12: she replied privately? (22:06:18) CorNouws: Ah, I'll have a look where I did read what - sorry. (22:06:34) stx12: ;-) (22:06:34) mhu: I have seen only Cor's public email, no answer at all (22:06:56) mhu: s/answer/reply/ (22:08:15) mhu: as stx12 already said, the legal status (and requirement) is that Sun and Oracle need to act as independent companies, until the acquisition is closed (22:08:47) mhu: so, we (Sun employees) are somewhat limited what we can discuss (22:09:08) ***_Nesshof_ was just thinking that the CC might want to a f2f meeting with the major sponsors at OOoCon to discuss about the project status, but this is independent from Sun/Oracle (22:09:10) mhu: publicly (22:09:54) CorNouws: Yes, Sophie's reply was on a mail that I did not send to Sunny's, just because of that limitation in discussions for you (22:10:08) CorNouws: But I can forward it, so that you can take knowledge of it (22:10:40) CorNouws: done (22:15:32) stx12: you mean with the meeting? (22:15:59) CorNouws: nearly :-) (22:16:10) CorNouws: Any other items for today?? (22:16:15) mhu: yes, please, almost 2 hours is more time than I usually have (22:17:48) CorNouws: OK, next meeting isJuly 9th, same place, same time ... (22:17:54) CorNouws: OK for all? (22:18:54) mhu: fine for me (22:19:01) CorNouws: I just see I missed Martins: "was just thinking that the CC might want to a f2f meeting with the major sponsors at OOoCon to discuss about the project status, but this is independent from Sun/Oracle" (22:19:08) stx12: have a nice evening (22:19:30) CorNouws: I like that suggestion (22:19:30) CorNouws: (both from Martin and Stefan) (22:20:27) cloph: good evening, thanks Cor for leading the meeting (22:20:30) mhu: yes, sophie's suggestion to give a preso to major stakeholder (like AB) sounds also good, maybe that fits to Martins f2f at ooocon (22:20:38) CorNouws: So meeting finished fo r now - thanks all - and sleep well (22:20:56) stx12: bye all... (22:21:13) mhu: okay, thanks for driving the meeting, Cor (22:21:24) mhu: bye for now (22:21:28) CorNouws: mhu: yes, we take that one - thanks (22:21:44) mhu is weggegaan (quit: "have a nice evening all"). (22:21:49) CorNouws: (I'll keep the log)