Difference between revisions of "ChildWorkSpace"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (What is a ChildWorkSpace?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== What is a ChildWorkSpace? ==
 
== What is a ChildWorkSpace? ==
  
Changes to [[OpenOffice.org]]'s code base are organized into smaller and independent units by a concept called <b>ChildWorkSpaces</b> ([[CWS]]).
+
A concept called <b>ChildWorkSpaces</b> ([[CWS]]) is used to organize changes to [[OpenOffice.org]] into smaller and independent units.
 +
 
 +
This page is intended as a first overview for end users. The wiki page "[[CWS]]" provides many more details for advanced contributors.
  
 
== How does it relate to Issues? ==
 
== How does it relate to Issues? ==

Revision as of 09:16, 16 August 2008

What is a ChildWorkSpace?

A concept called ChildWorkSpaces (CWS) is used to organize changes to OpenOffice.org into smaller and independent units.

This page is intended as a first overview for end users. The wiki page "CWS" provides many more details for advanced contributors.

How does it relate to Issues?

OpenOffice.org's code base may be changed as a result of Issues, which can be classified as defect reports, enhancement requests or feature requests. Issues are managed in a tool called issuezilla.

Related issues get grouped together and are assigned to a CWS. The resulting code change consists of bug fixes, enhancements and feature implementations that correspond to the list of issues registered for that CWS.

ChildWorkSpaces are managed in a tool called Environment Information System (EIS): It has all the details about each CWS, e.g. the list of tasks assigned to a CWS, its release target, the first milestone release where the CWS has been integrated, various testing results and the list of code changes.

The Process Flow

The relationship between an issue, a CWS and a release can be described as this idealized process flow:

  1. someone finds a problem or has an enhancement idea
  2. he checks that the problem or the idea are new
  3. he files an issue
  4. the issue is confirmed/tested by testers and/or developers
  5. the issue is marked as "confirmed"
  6. development accepts an issue by marking it as "new"
  7. development creates a ChildWorkSpace
  8. development assigns some issues to the CWS's task list
  9. the corresponding code changes are applied into the CWS's code base
  10. development marks the issue as "fixed"
  11. development checks that the changed CWS works as expected
  12. development changes the CWS status to "Ready for QA"
  13. testing checks for regressions and that the issues are solved
  14. tested issues are marked as "verified"
  15. testing changes the ChildWorkSpace status to "Approved by QA"
  16. "program management" changes the ChildWorkSpace status to "Nominated"
  17. "release engineering" integrates the code changes into a milestone release
  18. the ChildWorkSpace status is changed to "Integrated"
  19. the milestone is released
  20. testing checks the issues again on the released version
  21. testing marks the issues as "closed"

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: why is there a delay between the developer marking an issue as "fixed" and the availability of a milestone release, which has the fix integrated?

 A: there are a few steps inbetween, which all take their time: the fix has to be verified, integrated and then released

Q: which milestone release has the issue fixed?

 A1: the EIS entry of a CWS provides this important detail (also all other details)
 A2: the closing comment of a fixed issue is supposed to mention the milestone
 A3: the milestone's release notes contains an extensive list of resolved issues
Personal tools