Difference between revisions of "AutoInput"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Inconsistency between Calc and Writer)
(Issues with discoverability)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
=== Issues with discoverability ===
 
=== Issues with discoverability ===
  
* The name of the feature do not seems to match the name the user use to talk about the feature (auto-completion).
+
* The feature is '''hard to find in the menu''' because of unadapted intermediary steps:
* In Calc, the option is located in Tools > Cell content > AutoInput. This is illogical since the feature does not deal with cell content, but about the method used to input that content. See {{Bug|40908}}, {{Bug|17505}} and {{Bug|93483}}.
+
** '''In Calc''', the option is located in {{Spec/menuitem|Tools > Cell content > AutoInput}}. This is illogical since the feature does not deal with cell content, but about the method used to input that content. For examples of users that do not find this menu entry, see {{Bug|40908}}, {{Bug|17505}} and {{Bug|93483}}.
* There is no feedback telling what happened after completion, so in many cases (such as {{Bug|47848}}) the user do not understand the feature: how and when it works.
+
** '''In Writer''', the option is configured ''via'' a tab in the {{Spec/menuitem|Tools > AutoCorrect…}} dialog. But semantically, 'AutoInput' does not ''correct'' what the user has typed, it just helps her/him to enter it. So it is likely that many users wanting to configure AutoInput do not find where to make the changes (to do: look for issues).
 +
* The '''name of the feature''' is poorly chosen, and it has consequences on discoverability, because it does not match the name spontaneously given by most users when talking about the feature, which is 'auto-completion'. As a consequence, users looking for the feature may ''not recognize that this is the feature they are looking for''. The reason why 'AutoInput' has been preferred to auto-completion in Calc seems to be that it does not complete a word, but suggests a previous input. This is a questionable choice for Calc, but there is no such argument for Writer.
 +
* The '''lack of feedback''' explicating what happened after completion, may in many cases (such as {{Bug|47848}}) prevent the user to understand the feature, or even that there is a feature. We then miss an occasion to learn the user a new feature.
  
 
=== Issues with navigation ===
 
=== Issues with navigation ===

Revision as of 12:51, 11 February 2009

Introduction

This page will discuss the user interface for the AutoInput feature in Calc and Writer (also known as auto-completion.)

Status: Work in progress.

How it works

In Calc

When?

In cell input mode or in edition mode when the cursor is at the end of the field.

What?

The content of a cell above the edited cell, if not a formula.

The name of named ranges (see Issue 73997 ) in formula edition or input mode.

In Writer

Issues

Issues with discoverability

  • The feature is hard to find in the menu because of unadapted intermediary steps:
    • In Calc, the option is located in Tools > Cell content > AutoInput. This is illogical since the feature does not deal with cell content, but about the method used to input that content. For examples of users that do not find this menu entry, see Issue 40908 , Issue 17505 and Issue 93483 .
    • In Writer, the option is configured via a tab in the Tools > AutoCorrect… dialog. But semantically, 'AutoInput' does not correct what the user has typed, it just helps her/him to enter it. So it is likely that many users wanting to configure AutoInput do not find where to make the changes (to do: look for issues).
  • The name of the feature is poorly chosen, and it has consequences on discoverability, because it does not match the name spontaneously given by most users when talking about the feature, which is 'auto-completion'. As a consequence, users looking for the feature may not recognize that this is the feature they are looking for. The reason why 'AutoInput' has been preferred to auto-completion in Calc seems to be that it does not complete a word, but suggests a previous input. This is a questionable choice for Calc, but there is no such argument for Writer.
  • The lack of feedback explicating what happened after completion, may in many cases (such as Issue 47848 ) prevent the user to understand the feature, or even that there is a feature. We then miss an occasion to learn the user a new feature.

Issues with navigation

Issues with capitalization

Inconsistency between Calc and Writer

Inconsistency with auto-complete features from other products

Personal tools