Difference between revisions of "Architecture/Proposal/Advanced Threading-Architecture"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
m (→Problem) |
m (→Solution) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The following list gives a first idea, of what should be done, | The following list gives a first idea, of what should be done, | ||
* all (potentially) blocking calls need to be event driven, | * all (potentially) blocking calls need to be event driven, | ||
| − | * all long lasting calls need to be executed by dedicated threads, notifying the consumers via events / callbacks, in case data is available, | + | * all long lasting calls need to be executed by dedicated threads, notifying the consumers via events / callbacks, in case data is available (thus basically creating event sources and event sinks), |
* asynchronous signals need to be mapped to events, | * asynchronous signals need to be mapped to events, | ||
* Windows window messages need to be mapped to events, | * Windows window messages need to be mapped to events, | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 21 July 2006
State: draft Type: Proposal
Advanced OOo Threading Architecture
The advanced threading architecture aims to solve OOs multi threading and concurrency problems.
Problem
The following list gives a brief overview, of where the problems lie,
- unresponsive user interface (e.g. trying to connect to a particular web server may take somes minutes, without repaint and everything (it can take more time, if you have more than one http:// reference in your document) ;-),
- busy waiting (e.g. frequent re-schedule or yield calls),
- scalability with multiple threads, in particular when doing API programming,
- most long lasting operations (e.g. loading, saving, printing etc.) are not interruptable.
Solution
OOo must be changed to be purely event / callback driven.
The following list gives a first idea, of what should be done,
- all (potentially) blocking calls need to be event driven,
- all long lasting calls need to be executed by dedicated threads, notifying the consumers via events / callbacks, in case data is available (thus basically creating event sources and event sinks),
- asynchronous signals need to be mapped to events,
- Windows window messages need to be mapped to events,
- the threading architecture must be defined high level, e.g.
- concurrency per application, or
- concurrency per document.
Pros
- Not calling potential blocking system calls leads to 'short' lasting mutex acquisitions.
- No hand crafted reschedules necessary anymore.
- Easy utilization of Hyper Threading, multi cores and SMP.
- Controlable CPU utilization and possible avoidance of over utilization.
- 'Simple' architecture.
- One single location where to create threads.
Cons
- (assumed to be) Hard to implement.
Pseudo Code for event loop:
void dispatch(int signal) {
switch(signal) {
case SIGIO:
fileHandler(getHandle());
break;
case SIGTERM:
...
}
}
int quit;
sigset_t sigset;
int main(void) {
int signal;
while(!quit) {
sigwait(&sigset, &signal);
dispatch(signal);
}
return 0;
}
