Difference between revisions of "Talk:OOo and Subversion"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(subversion pages reorg.)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The Subversion pages need a little reorg. I propose to split up the docs to the following pages:
 
The Subversion pages need a little reorg. I propose to split up the docs to the following pages:
- Setting up subversion on the clientside (done once by devs)
+
* Setting up subversion on the clientside (done once by devs)
- Using Subversion and OOos additional tooling (cws command/rebases etc.) (done again and again by devs)
+
* Using Subversion and OOos additional tooling (cws command/rebases etc.) (done again and again by devs)
- migrating and CVS cws to subversion (shouldnt be needed for much longer)
+
* migrating a CVS cws to subversion (shouldnt be needed for much longer)
- OOo serverside setup (only relevant for releng and tooling devs)
+
* OOo serverside setup and tooling internals (only relevant for releng and tooling devs)
 
Any objections?
 
Any objections?
 
--[[User:B michaelsen|B michaelsen]] 21:33, 11 December 2008 (CET)
 
--[[User:B michaelsen|B michaelsen]] 21:33, 11 December 2008 (CET)
 +
 +
Not at all. Please go for it.
 +
--[[User:Hr|Jens-Heiner Rechtien]]

Latest revision as of 10:49, 12 December 2008

The Subversion pages need a little reorg. I propose to split up the docs to the following pages:

  • Setting up subversion on the clientside (done once by devs)
  • Using Subversion and OOos additional tooling (cws command/rebases etc.) (done again and again by devs)
  • migrating a CVS cws to subversion (shouldnt be needed for much longer)
  • OOo serverside setup and tooling internals (only relevant for releng and tooling devs)

Any objections? --B michaelsen 21:33, 11 December 2008 (CET)

Not at all. Please go for it. --Jens-Heiner Rechtien

Personal tools