MSA-Base Faq

Common questions and answers for those migrating from Microsoft Access (MSA) to OpenOffice.org Base.

This is a user community effort - add to the knowledge base if you can.

Please however try to keep the questions and answers general. If there is an answer regarding a feature specific version of MSA then include the version number also.

Specifically, please only update the wiki if you have an answer for the question you are adding. ( If you may need to get back shortly with the answer don't let that stop you from getting the question in first however - just come back before long )

For asking specific questions or for general help it would be appropriate to then ask on either the: Base Forum or on the Base users mailing list.

Can I use Microsoft Access databases (.mdb) in Base?

On Windows: yes. You cannot open them directly via File|Open, but you can access the data therein. For this, you need an Open Document Base file (*.odb), which holds the connection information. For details see Microsoft Access or Connecting to Microsoft Access.

You can modify the data in the tables and you can add and remove records. You can create new tables, but you cannot alter the structure of existing tables.

Queries in MS Access are shown as views in the table container. You can use the query results, but you have no access to the underlying definitions and you cannot alter them.

You cannot read MS Access forms or reports.

Can I read my Base database from MS Access (MSA)?

That depends. There's no way to to link to tables stored within a Base .odb file, otherwise known as an "embedded database." But if your Base .odb file is linked to an external, MSA-compatible, data source, particularly those offering an "ODBC" connection option, then MSA will 'Link to the data source by creating a linked table.' And with the "ODBC" option you get read/write access. Changes made in MSA will be reflected in the data source, and therefore in Base, and vice versa.

Technically, it is possible to extract an "embedded database" from a Base .odb file through a manual extraction process. This is necessary for instance to upgrade from the built-in HSQLDB 1.8 engine to the latest HSQLDB 2.x engine in order to take advantage of new HSQLDB features which may soon include an "ODBC" link option as necessary for MSA linking. But for now HSQLDB only provides Java-based "JDBC" linking, which is noticeably absent from MSA's link options. So a third-party ODBC-to-JDBC "bridge" or "gateway" (diagram) is currently required to connect to a database generated by the HSQLDB engine as bundled with OpenOffice.org.

As an alternative to "bridging" it should be possible to migrate your HSQL database to one that offers "ODBC" connectivity. Most options are compatible with both MSA and Base including: SQL Server Express, H2 (tutorial), SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Firebird, MS SQL Server, Oracle, etc.

It is possible to use a Base .odb file to update data in a MSA database (.mdb), but only on a Windows machine. This requires the MSA database be opened and locked by the Base file.

Data could also be passed back to the MSA database by creating a linked CSV file in the Base database. Then linking to this CSV file to a table in the MSA database.

Can I create an Access database (mdb file) with Base?

No. Base cannot create a new Access database file; or new tables; or modify existing table structures/properties. Base queries, forms and reports can be added to the Base .odb file, but not to the Access .mdb file.

Can I create a Switchboard in Base?

Base does not currently have a switchboard style form wizard. It is possible to achieve a very similar effect however using one of several techniques.

Using a stand alone form to launch the Base database

see Tutorial: Standalone Forms / Switchboard

Base Switchboard extension

Development started to bring switchboard feature into OOo, see the Roberto Benitez's Base Switchboard extension.

Our MS Access (MSA) databases uses "Workgroup Security" to control group/user permission to view/maintain data. Is similar access control and security possible with Base?

This question highlights some fundamental differences between Base and MS Access (MSA). MSA's Jet/ACE engine is integral so even linked data-sources are accessed through Jet/ACE. This has been a problem for "database security" because the all-in-one MDB/ACCDB file supports either "workgroup" (access control) or "security" (encryption) but not both. Specifically, the Jet-MDB database format (MSA 2003 and earlier) is not truly "secure" but it does offer "workgroup" (access control) functions including individual user-login and user/group permissions. This could be combined with security features of the host file system (NTFS/EFS) to formulate crude database security. On the other hand, the ACE-ACCDB file format (MSA 2007) is relatively "secure" (encryption) but forgoes the "workgroup" function in favor of a single login. So MSA's "Workgroup Security" has been little more than an oxymoron. Perhaps so much so, that Microsoft wisely decided to depreciate "Workgroup Security" in MSA 2010 -- but continues to support the legacy function of the Jet engine for MDB files created with MSA 2003 or earlier.

So database security has now formally shifted away from built-in Jet/ACE engine, such that MSA relies primarily on the security provided by linked data-source engines. Perhaps along those lines, MSA 2010 offers to 'split the database' into front-end and back-end files. This can be accomplished manually by eliminating all Tables in a copy of the MDB/ACCDB file. But either way you'll need to skip the Jet/ACE back-end, using only the MDB/ACCDB front-end to link to a full-featured database engine supporting robust database security.

This is now very similar to Base. In Base, all multi-user databases are "split." The Base 'user authentication' feature could use some improvements, but Base is purely a front-end (client application) to a variety of database engines. The engines, themselves, provide various levels of database security: from none with dBase files or SQLite; to role based access control (RBAC) using the built-in HSQLDB engine; to both RBAC and database encryption with more advanced engines.

For comprehensive database security with Base, including encryption, consider HSQLDB 2.x, H2, Apache Derby, PostgreSQL 9.1 or later, Oracle with the Advanced Security option, and of course MS SQL Server 2008 or later with TDE. If you're supporting a very large number of users, and/or need concurrent MSA front-end connectivity (requiring ODBC), then select among the latter options: PostgreSQL, Oracle, or MS SQL Server.

The Base-bundled HSQLDB engine is similar to MSA's Jet/ACE engine in terms of multi-user function. HSQLDB must be run in server mode in support of multiple users, as with alternative engines. This engine supports 'role based access control' similar to the Jet-MDB "workgroup" function. Security is likewise limited. Otherwise, the primary role of the built-in HSQLDB engine is in support of the "embedded database" configuration which 'embeds' the database data inside the Base ODB container file, similar to MDB/ACCDB. This all-in-one ODB file is often referred to as a "Base database." But unlike MSA files, this "embedded database" ODB file is configured for single-user access. It's also prone to corruption, so these all-in-one ODB files are not recommended beyond database-prototyping and examples. A production database should always be deployed in a 'split' configuration using an ODB file generated by the "Connect to an existing database" wizard. In a split-configuration, no back-end database data is stored within the Base ODB file. Only front-end components such as Base Queries, Forms, Reports and Macros are stored therein. This is very similar to the 'split database' function in MSA 2010.

There are some considerations when deploying a split database in multi-user environments. This split configuration allows you to share the front-end files (MDB/ACCDB/ODB) file for common access to front-end Queries, Forms, Reports and Macros, while maintaining multi-user access to the back-end database. You can also distribute personal copies of the front-end (MDB/ACCDB/ODB) to allow user-specific Queries, Forms, etc. -- while each maintains access to the central database(s). Personal copies of the front-end will provide the most robust/stable user environment/experience, although front-end updates become more difficult to distribute.

Is a Form in Base different from a Form in MSA?

Yes. There are very real differences between how Forms are implemented in Access and Base.

Virtual forms within Base forms

Virtual forms in Base are called "subforms". You can manage them opening the form in Edit mode and then clicking on "Form Navigator", in "Form Design" toolbar.

Where are the Delete / Update queries?

Base does not currently support building delete / insert / update queries in the designer.

Equivalent actions

using the Query Designer

You can achieve the equivalent actions in the GUI using the designer and or SQL commands.

Converting my VBA modules to Base modules

What happened to me?

There is no exact duplicate to the ME pseudo variable in VBA.

In Access VBA 'me' has attributes of two separate objects in OOoBasic: TextDocument and DataForm

The TextDocument object would be used for controlling the window size and placement on the screen for instance.

The DataForm meanwhile supports result set functions, such as First, Filter, InsertRow.

In OOoBasic the pseudo variable thisComponent normally would be the TextDocument, while thisComponent.DrawPage.Forms(0) meanwhile would reference the first DataForm owned by the TextDocument.

Perhaps a still closer equivalent is to use the object ownership hierarchy to get to the form. For example, if we had a single table form with a button, then in the macro called by the 'onClick' (or as OOBase calls it the 'When initializing' event) we would do this: Create a macro in a library named onButtonClick( oEv as object )

   sub onButtonClick( oEv as object )
     ' oEv is the event object passed automatically
     ' it has a property SOURCE which is the 
     ' button that initiated this call
   
     dim oForm as variant
   
     oForm = oEv.Source.Model.Parent
      ' oForm is now the virtual form objct
     
     dim oDocument as variant
     
     oDocument = thisComponent
      ' oDocument is now the textDocument displayed in
      ' the window on screen
   
   end sub

Where is findfirst?

Base does not appear to have a FindFirst function on the rowset like MS Access, what is the equivalent Base function?

MSAccess VBA example:

Say there is a VB combo box which lists all the prospects in the database and allows the user to select a particular prospect and then have the form automatically go to that person's data record.

 Private Sub Find_Combo_AfterUpdate()
 Dim strCriteria As String
 
 strCriteria = "[Prospect_ID] =" & Me.Find_Combo
 
 Me.recordsetclone.FindFirst (strCriteria)
 If me.recordsetclone.NoMatch Then
     MsgBox "No entry found"
 Else
     Form_F_Prospects.Bookmark = me.recordsetclone.Bookmark
 End If
 
 End Sub

For this type of simple single column search it is easy enough to create our own find first equivalent with OOoBasic:

Sub Find_Combo_AfterUpdate( OEv as Object)
   ' Oev is the event object automatically sent
   ' to sub procedure call
   ' Oev will have a property Source
   ' that is the control that triggered
   ' the call to this procedure
 
 Dim oForm as variant ' The dataform obejct 
 
 Dim oComboBox as variant ' The combobox control
 
 Dim oBkMark as variant
 
 oForm = oEv.Source.Model.Parent
 
 oComboBox = oForm.getByName( "Find_Combo" )
   
 oBkMark = FindFirst( oForm.CreateResultSet(), "Prospect_ID", oComboBox.Text )
     ' oForm.CreateResultSet() is equivilant here to me.recordsetclone
 if not IsEmpty( oBkMark ) then
 		oForm.moveToBookmark( oBkMark )
 else
 	msgBox( oComboBox.Text & " not found" )
 end if
 
end sub

function FindFirst( oRS as variant, ColName as string, SearchVal as string ) as variant
       ' oRS is a resultSet object
       ' ColName is the name of a column in the resultset
       ' SearchVal is
   dim colIDX as integer
   dim NotFound as variant
 
   FindFirst = notFound
   colIDX = oRS.FindColumn( ColName )
   oRS.First
   do 
     if oRS.getString( colIDX ) <> Searchval
       oRS.Next
       if oRS.isAfterLast then
         exit do
       endif
     else
       FindFirst = oRS.getBookMark
       exit do
     end if
   loop while oRS.isAfterLast <> True
 
end function

Is there an equivalent to DoCmd RunSQL

Yes, in OOoBase you would use either a Statement or PreparedStatement object to achieve the same function. With OOoBase you must also decide between using execute and executeUpdate.

For example if you had the VBA line

 DoCmd RunSQL( "SELECT * FROM tContacts" )

it would become in OOoBase

 Dim oStatement as variant
 
 oStatement = OForm.ActiveConnection.CreateStatement
   ' Where oForm is a DataForm object
   ' NOTE you could do exactly the same thing with
   ' a resultSet or rowSet obejct also
   ' oStatement = OResultSet.ActiveConnection.CreateStatement
 
 oStatement.execute( "SELECT * FROM ""tContacts"""  )
 

If on the other hand the VBA line where

 DoCmd RunSQL( "DELETE FROM tContacts WHERE Status = 'INACTIVE'" )

then we would use the executeUpdate method on a statement

 oStatement.executeUpdate( "DELETE FROM ""tContacts"" WHERE ""Status"" = 'INACTIVE'"  )

The rule is -

• if your SQL statement will return records you use execute or executeQuery.
• if the SQL statement returns no records then you must use executeUpdate.

If I use Lookup fields/columns in my Access tables what can I do in Base?

There are two parts to this answer, given that Base does not support Lookup column types in tables.

When a table is displayed in a custom form use of a bound listbox will give you the same functionality. An example of adding a listbox to a form and to a grid control on a form is at this page.

In a table view ( double clicking on the table name ) there is no equivalent to this.

How do I use Domain Aggregate functions in Base?

Domain Aggregate functions such as DCount, DLookup, DMax etc have no direct equivalent in Base. You will have to write or design queries to return these results using the appropriate SQL functions.

How do I add Calculated Controls to my forms and reports?

Controls in Base forms and reports cannot be used to perform calculations. There are two methods available to get a calculated result on a form or report.

Using a query

Modify the underlying data source of the form or report to perform the calculation for each record and return the result as a (calculated) field.

Using a macro

If you need your control to update as data is entered into a form, you will need to write a small macro to perform the calculation and assign it to an appropriate event on one of the data entry controls (e.g. the Text modified event).

Autor: MSA-Base Faq Drew 21:01, 11 September 2007 (CEST) '
Please do not change the logical content of this site without acknowledge of the author or the OOo QA Project Lead/Co-Leads. christian louboutin